Which of the following would you consider to be "scientific misconduct"? (tick as many as you like)
publishing data that contains a known error (not picked up in peer review)
copying an introductory paragraph (i.e. containing no results, conclusions or original ideas) verbatim from another publication without appropriate quotation or citation
reporting the same results in several papers ("self-plagiarism")
removing a co-author's name from a paper, even though they contributed to the work
withholding conflicts of interest in a publication, or in reviewing a paper
not keeping a detailed research record or not archiving experimental data
hiding negative data in publications of research results
failing to report scientific misconduct when it's witnessed first hand
obtaining observational data that are not yours and not publicly available
adding a co-author to a journal paper who didn't actually contribute to the work
fitting data to a model ("fudging")
stalling the review of another scientist's paper so your own paper on the same topic gets published first
Vote
View Results
See this poll on:
https://poll.fm/1539785/embed
