I had mistakenly thought that employers could no longer terminate employment on grounds of age. I thought there were rules against ageism now.
If an employee is still performing well, and if they wish to continue working, why should they not be allowed to continue beyond the age of 65? This would be good for health, well-being, and for the economy.
Our pensions are failing, while we also live much longer nowadays - it's crazy to prevent a willing and capable person from working.
Posted by sue bond on July 21st 2009, 1:19am