Are you worried for Barack and Michelle's security?

6 Comments

  • steven - 14 years ago

    Can I just say to lambert, "youidiot!!!"

  • Phyne Chick - 14 years ago

    Kevin,

    I voted for NO because I believe they are not in harm's way but not for the idiotic reason you did. Your 19-year-old son chose to fight for the country. No one put a gun to his head and made him join the military. No one drafted him. You need what he was getting into when he joined. Considering what happened in Fort Hood, Iraq and Afghanistan should be the last of your worries.

    In addition to your constant rambling and annoying Anti-American babble, I should correct in the matter that suggesting President Obama's underage kids as being an candidate to war proves that you're the idiot and not the people who voted "Yes". The other dignitaries that you mentioned did not sign up for war, that's why they "aren't getting their heads blown off". You can't become bitter because your son became a man before you did and thought of his country with love oppose to his Anti-American father. Obviously there are some issues that are not disclosed to the general public (thank God) that they are trying to prevent.

    Your political view should date back to Nixon and Kissenger, my friend. If it wasn't for Kissenger's willingness to please the Middle East by giving them American weapons, we wouldn't be in this mess over 20 years later. I am not in favor of everything the government says and does but your comment was too off the wall to not comment. Attorneys aren't the only jerks on the planet, you may want to add to that list the idiots who commit the crimes.

  • Kevin Lambert - 14 years ago

    What is the big deal? Barack and Michelle aren't holy. They, and all the Washington elites have no problems wanting to send my innocent 19 year old son to their filthy wars, like Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan and Iraq yet Baracks kids nor Barack nor Nancy Pelosi nor George W. or his daughters will ever be on the front lines getting their heads blown off. Now some of you government-loving suckups may want to hold our elitists up as holy but can you spell Sanford, Spitzer, Kwame Kilpatrick, Blagojevick, Ensign, Franklin Roosevelt (mr. socialist of all time), wife-cheater John Kennedy, wife-cheater and mistress killer Ted Kennedy, rich hypocrite Nancy Pelosi, wife-cheater Newt Gingrich, let's not forget the guy who treated all women like dirt Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton the political whore who stayed by her cheating husband and set a bad example for what all little girls should take from some filthy partner. Tell me, why would any idiot be worried about protecting any government official? If anything those uninvited guests should have been fearful of being around the elitists and having their pockets picked if they did an honest day's work. And I'm not scared if anyone knows who I am either. It is time to stand up to the hypocrisy destroying the society that a lot of wonderful young men and women died for. Remember most politicians are lawyers, and what do they teach lawyers in law school? They don't teach them right and wrong as important principles, they teach them to gore the opposing side and win at all costs. Truth be damned is the unspoken motto of 99% of lawyers and politicians. Kevin A.C. Lambert

  • Dan The Mann - 14 years ago

    It is absolutely frightening to me that almost three quarters of the people polled, believed there was no security breach !!!

    My wife and I both thought of this, AS SOON AS the story broke !
    It was the first thing on my mind !!!

    The fact that these socialites had access to the White House, through the
    good offices of presumably reliable friends, does not excuse the breach.
    The President and his wife were PUT IN HARM'S WAY, if all the security measures in place, were not good enough to thwart the breach !
    If the Obama's feel threatened by this, they have every entitlement.

    The couple should be indighted for a CRIME ! The Ambassador obviously
    cannot be. But it would be appropriate for the Obama's not to extend
    another invitation. It was not only a breach of security !
    IT WAS RUDE BEHAVIOR !!!

  • Dan The Mann - 14 years ago

    It is absolutely frightening to me that almost three quarters of the people polled, believed there was no security breach !!!

    My wife and I both thought of this, AS SOON AS the story broke !
    It was the first thing on my mind !!!

    The fact that these socialites had access to the White House, through the
    good offices of presumably reliable friends, does not excuse the breach.
    The President and his wife were PUT IN HARM'S WAY, if all the security measures in place, were not good enough to thwart the breach !
    If the Obama's feel threatened by this, they have every entitlement.

    The couple should be indighted for a CRIME ! The Ambassador obviously
    cannot be. But it would be appropriate for the Obama's not to extend
    another invitation. It was not only a breach of security !
    IT WAS RUDE BEHAVIOR !!!

  • Douglas Brewer - 14 years ago

    Too bad they did not wear a proper vest!

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment