There are numerous search queries for which the web sites returned in search outcomes could
be located anywhere in the globe. Examples contain men and women hunting for info on how
to achieve a particular activity and running a query for it, like 'œHow to use Photoshop' or 'œHow to repair a hole in jeans.' In other circumstances,
the user could be looking for a solution that could be
supplied by a company providing its services at a national or international
level, such as web hosting or online fax services.
Mary Cali - 14 years ago
Anyone who puts climatology in the same category as creationism and astrology has no idea what climatology is. To begin with climatology is a legitimate science, where creationism and astrology are not.
Also, climatology is about gathering data worldwide over a longer period of time than one winter season in one part of the globe.
Again, the deniers have no conception about what GLOBAL means.
Guybrush - 14 years ago
What is it about global (warmimg) that the GW deniers don't understand??
Same thing Galileo didn't understand about the geocentric universe, it's not backed up by science, only superstition.
Unless you can correct me and all the 10's of thousands of skeptical scientists with your superior scientific understanding?
Maria Cali - 14 years ago
What is it about global that the GW deniers don't understand?? The deniers pointed to the 2009 low number of hurricanes in the Atlantic and Caribbean as evidence that GW is a myth. However, the Pacific had a very active typhoon, aka hurricane, season, hitting the Philippines four times.
GW is a GLOBAL phenomenon. Evidence for it is found globally. Canada had a warm winter, while Florida had a colder than usual winter. The data for global warming keeps piling up. There are those who will never accept it as there are some who do not accetp evolution.
Guybrush - 14 years ago
And sure, this winter is as good evidence as any that global warming is a myth.
Guybrush - 14 years ago
(The yes and no are the wrong way around for the question)
In answer to Ed. Any Nat. academy or any other gov't advocacy group who endorsed the discredited IPCC reports have by association discredited themselves.
Institutionalized consensus is not science. As Galileo, Darwin or Einstein would point out!
10's of thousands of independent qualified scientists have put their names to specific statements utterly refuting the global warming scare stories put out by a handful of disgraced political/activist groups like IPCC, CRU, GISS etc.
But the point of science is not having to take anyone's word for it. Real science is based on scientific method and enjoys wide support throughout all scientific fields
Junk science like astrology, creationism or climatology has no hard evidence, repeatable experiments, or empirical observations, only superstition, intuition, populism and so support falls off precipitously outside it's own narrow field.
Ed Lscinskas - 14 years ago
NASA says this January was the 2nd warmest since 1880. The southern hemisphere was very warm. We must remember that the north American continent is only 1 & 1/2 % of the worlds surface ( includes oceans).
Unfortunately this weather helps the global warming deniers.
The deniers, many ordinary citizens, & their scientific brothers are winning the public relations battle,not just because of gobs of energy Corp. money but because the electronic media gives them equal footing with settled science.
The media needs to state in every one of these broadcasts the simple truth that our Nat. Academy of Science & those of another 31 developed nations have formally endorsed the IPCCs findings. These are the people whose charter is to advance science & who we depend on to guide all scientific endeavors.
There are numerous search queries for which the web sites returned in search outcomes could
be located anywhere in the globe. Examples contain men and women hunting for info on how
to achieve a particular activity and running a query for it, like 'œHow to use Photoshop' or 'œHow to repair a hole in jeans.' In other circumstances,
the user could be looking for a solution that could be
supplied by a company providing its services at a national or international
level, such as web hosting or online fax services.
Anyone who puts climatology in the same category as creationism and astrology has no idea what climatology is. To begin with climatology is a legitimate science, where creationism and astrology are not.
Also, climatology is about gathering data worldwide over a longer period of time than one winter season in one part of the globe.
Again, the deniers have no conception about what GLOBAL means.
What is it about global (warmimg) that the GW deniers don't understand??
Same thing Galileo didn't understand about the geocentric universe, it's not backed up by science, only superstition.
Unless you can correct me and all the 10's of thousands of skeptical scientists with your superior scientific understanding?
What is it about global that the GW deniers don't understand?? The deniers pointed to the 2009 low number of hurricanes in the Atlantic and Caribbean as evidence that GW is a myth. However, the Pacific had a very active typhoon, aka hurricane, season, hitting the Philippines four times.
GW is a GLOBAL phenomenon. Evidence for it is found globally. Canada had a warm winter, while Florida had a colder than usual winter. The data for global warming keeps piling up. There are those who will never accept it as there are some who do not accetp evolution.
And sure, this winter is as good evidence as any that global warming is a myth.
(The yes and no are the wrong way around for the question)
In answer to Ed. Any Nat. academy or any other gov't advocacy group who endorsed the discredited IPCC reports have by association discredited themselves.
Institutionalized consensus is not science. As Galileo, Darwin or Einstein would point out!
10's of thousands of independent qualified scientists have put their names to specific statements utterly refuting the global warming scare stories put out by a handful of disgraced political/activist groups like IPCC, CRU, GISS etc.
But the point of science is not having to take anyone's word for it. Real science is based on scientific method and enjoys wide support throughout all scientific fields
Junk science like astrology, creationism or climatology has no hard evidence, repeatable experiments, or empirical observations, only superstition, intuition, populism and so support falls off precipitously outside it's own narrow field.
NASA says this January was the 2nd warmest since 1880. The southern hemisphere was very warm. We must remember that the north American continent is only 1 & 1/2 % of the worlds surface ( includes oceans).
Unfortunately this weather helps the global warming deniers.
The deniers, many ordinary citizens, & their scientific brothers are winning the public relations battle,not just because of gobs of energy Corp. money but because the electronic media gives them equal footing with settled science.
The media needs to state in every one of these broadcasts the simple truth that our Nat. Academy of Science & those of another 31 developed nations have formally endorsed the IPCCs findings. These are the people whose charter is to advance science & who we depend on to guide all scientific endeavors.