Surely all civivilizationn and all people who believed the
truth of my statement are not wrong. And what of
Darwin. Under your bias against civilization
and the natural order no species would have been allowed
to originate.
Matt - 14 years ago
A disaster for the family and democracy? Seriously Jack? I think a majority thought the same thing about allowing interracial marriages. Ok, so marriage is only meant for those who can procreate? What about those people who can't have children because of biological reasons? How about older couples? Children need a mother and father? Sure having two role models would be ideal, but what about all those single parents out there? Get your bigoted head out of the sand and open your eyes.
JACK SULLIVAN - 14 years ago
What a disaster for the family and democracy in Massachusetts! Marriage
is between a man and woman. Only they can procreate.
And children need a mother and father for proper development
not two people playing roles. This is not an issue of equality
as nature has already arranged the superiority of man and woman.
Surely biology is not bigotry!
Peter Brooks - 14 years ago
This random poll accurately reflects what would have happened if the special interests had not denied the electorate the vote on this radical attempt to make marriage meaningless.
Surely all civivilizationn and all people who believed the
truth of my statement are not wrong. And what of
Darwin. Under your bias against civilization
and the natural order no species would have been allowed
to originate.
A disaster for the family and democracy? Seriously Jack? I think a majority thought the same thing about allowing interracial marriages. Ok, so marriage is only meant for those who can procreate? What about those people who can't have children because of biological reasons? How about older couples? Children need a mother and father? Sure having two role models would be ideal, but what about all those single parents out there? Get your bigoted head out of the sand and open your eyes.
What a disaster for the family and democracy in Massachusetts! Marriage
is between a man and woman. Only they can procreate.
And children need a mother and father for proper development
not two people playing roles. This is not an issue of equality
as nature has already arranged the superiority of man and woman.
Surely biology is not bigotry!
This random poll accurately reflects what would have happened if the special interests had not denied the electorate the vote on this radical attempt to make marriage meaningless.
How in the heck could something like this be bad for the state of MA? Has anyone noticed any of the serious issues going on???