proved my point about people not knowing what's good then didn't you.
cena is worse than hogan
KenDeep - 13 years ago
It doesn't matter weither we talk about what they could be or what they are... Orton is too bland charisma-wise, while Cena has half his matches build up the same way. I'd honestly take Hustle-Cena over Oily-Legs-Orton anyday.
Cena: Can work very good to excellent matches, as Wrestlemania has proven, as did MITB, etc. He also can do the mic-part, even though it could be so much better if it weren't his bland character he's playing. The bad matches he participates in are either filler-matches, TV-Matches or Build-Up Matches. As soon as the matches have something important, they rock.
Orton: Can work good matches on a constant basis, but they rarely exceed the excellent-scala. Vs. Christian was such a match, and for that I give him credit. But I never have that "awesome!"-moment when he is in the ring. Mic-Wise he just plain sucks. I AM GOING TO CRUSH. YOUR. SKULL. WHILE. I. SPEAK. IN. A. MONOTONE. VOICE. *fistpumps the floor*
I honestly don't know why Orton is on the top of the card... especially as a face. While his way to speak fits his heel-character, it doesn't make it any more pleasant.
Mr Anderson - 13 years ago
actually, think Orton is an excellent performer, WHEN he is in the heel role, he's boring as a face, sure, but then who isn't?
Coocoo Catchoo - 13 years ago
Cuttlefish and asparagus or vanilla paste? Both aren't much to write home about, don't you think?
Mr Anderson - 13 years ago
46% think cena is better? wow, we have some pathetic closet cena fan's here on TJR, be ashamed of yourselves.
Leave a Comment
Give others the chance to vote.
Share this poll, because the more votes the better.
proved my point about people not knowing what's good then didn't you.
cena is worse than hogan
It doesn't matter weither we talk about what they could be or what they are... Orton is too bland charisma-wise, while Cena has half his matches build up the same way. I'd honestly take Hustle-Cena over Oily-Legs-Orton anyday.
Cena: Can work very good to excellent matches, as Wrestlemania has proven, as did MITB, etc. He also can do the mic-part, even though it could be so much better if it weren't his bland character he's playing. The bad matches he participates in are either filler-matches, TV-Matches or Build-Up Matches. As soon as the matches have something important, they rock.
Orton: Can work good matches on a constant basis, but they rarely exceed the excellent-scala. Vs. Christian was such a match, and for that I give him credit. But I never have that "awesome!"-moment when he is in the ring. Mic-Wise he just plain sucks. I AM GOING TO CRUSH. YOUR. SKULL. WHILE. I. SPEAK. IN. A. MONOTONE. VOICE. *fistpumps the floor*
I honestly don't know why Orton is on the top of the card... especially as a face. While his way to speak fits his heel-character, it doesn't make it any more pleasant.
actually, think Orton is an excellent performer, WHEN he is in the heel role, he's boring as a face, sure, but then who isn't?
Cuttlefish and asparagus or vanilla paste? Both aren't much to write home about, don't you think?
46% think cena is better? wow, we have some pathetic closet cena fan's here on TJR, be ashamed of yourselves.