Donald Trump is not on your voting list. Why not?
My vote is for Donld Trump.
dicemanace - 12 years ago
Ron Paul is not on this poll because they want to choose for you.
Joemely - 13 years ago
Ron Paul
AMERICAN INDEPENDANT PARIOT - 13 years ago
You left Rick Perry's name off. What kindergartener made this poll?
Grace Davis - 13 years ago
We the people are watching you and we are getting stronger everyday!!!!Ron Paul 2012!He will go all the way!!!!!!!!!
Truth - 13 years ago
It doesn't matter about the removal of Ron Paul, the neocons and military Keynesianists have been doing this for years now and where has it got them. We surround you. You cannot hide the truth any more. Ron Paul 2012!
MA - 13 years ago
I also think it was stupid to remove the clown Ron Paul. Just give the readers a hint that The Ron Paul Church is mobilizing, and let it be enough.
Otherwise, if The Ron Paul Church mobilizing here so well that he's get 90 percent, and you cant see the difference between the other candidates, remove him and explain the situation -- i .e. be honest about Ron Pauls figures when you removes him.
The drawback with removal of candidates -- even (or especially) clowns -- is that this, not without some substance, makes the fans of that candidate feeling so much more motivated. I think that J S Mill explained the implications of silencing different views. One have to stick on to free speech (especially for lunatics).
bob - 13 years ago
I wondered how in the world could Jon Huntsman be second; he was invisible last night....then I saw Ron Paul supporters were using Huntsman for a protest vote.
Ron Paul is a crazy old coot if it werent for his promise to legalize drugs he wouldn't have a third of his current devotees.
Once and a while he sounds credible when he's talking about personal freedoms in the abstract.....but picturing him on the world stage representing the USA is cringe-worthy to say the least.
justanothervoice - 13 years ago
Maybe I don't really understand how "bots" work, but I know I had to supply a user name and e-mail address before I could post. Seriously, does anybody buy this "paulbot" crap. With Paul's name removed, I didn't bother to vote "which is clearly the point". So tell me, did a bot leave this comment?! How do you explain this? What about the overwhelming response from the LIVE audiences at the debates...must be bots. Paul is #4 on google trends for most searched...bots right? News anchors are overwhelmed with angry responses and e-mails when they ignore Paul...bots!! There is no evidence, anywhere, that I am aware of, that shows tampering with systems and polls in Paul's favor.
However, there have been several to admit and/or apologize for purposely tampering with and/or outright removing things that show him as favorable; stating concerns over possible tampering as reason, once called on it. Sound familiar? (the removal, not the admitting it part).
ProudPaulbot - 13 years ago
U mad bro?
Bob - 13 years ago
There are no Paul-bots... people online are just more informed than people subjected to mainstream media 24/7. They don't get facts, they get the mainstream media/corporate choice for office.
Greg - 13 years ago
There were only 8 candidates... Leaving off Ron Paul is completely ignorant and biased.
dean - 13 years ago
My vote is for Ron Paul, looks like you don't look like you want my vote or real results in your poll.
Jason - 13 years ago
Here is a REAL poll: http://www.topix.com/issue/fox/gop-debate-aug11
Todd Stclair - 13 years ago
You say the "Paulbots" manipulated the poll by posting and sharing the link to your poll... An IP address can only be counted once. So if you don't like the results, then guess what. There are more of us now then in 2008. We are not going away. We are getting our country back from the war loving media controlling corporations we are fighting now. You are one of them.
Todd Stclair - 13 years ago
Ron Paul by far is the winner and you not having him on this poll is un-american and down right wrong - help your country - dont mess it up hiding the man who warned us of the 08 crash, this 2011 crash, and is warning us of a future that most citizens are blind to.
john - 13 years ago
Ron Paul 2012..... you losers didn't even include the real winner in your poll.
AJ Fresco - 13 years ago
JOHN HUNTSMAN = RON PAUL FOR POLLS THAT REMOVE HIM
VOTE HUNTSMAN IN PLACE OF PAUL IF THEY REMOVE HIM
JOHN HUNTSMAN = RON PAUL FOR POLLS THAT REMOVE HIM
VOTE HUNTSMAN IN PLACE OF PAUL IF THEY REMOVE HIM
Swifty - 13 years ago
No Dr. Paul?
Evidently, you have realised that leaving him out of the poll is the only way to stop him from winning it!
LOL!
Dave Eggersly - 13 years ago
What a farce. Don't even acknowledge the only candidate with any honesty.
Okay. Yes, we censored Ron Paul. Yes, we censored Ron Paul supporters' comments. Yes, we just want Romney to win and the status quo to prevail. So what?
MA (non-socialist pro-smallgov from Sweden) - 13 years ago
Btw, my 1/5 for Bachmann is because she's like Cain sometimes very one-way "stupid" on some issues, and don't seems to have necessary knowledge. So she can't deliver everytime she's confronted, e g with inconsistency. When she can't answer she's get silent for one or two seconds which is non-convincing, and then she's not deliver good enough. In my view she plunged from 2 to 1, and like e g Cain I think she's not GOP's candidate.
Some candidates I don't know anything about...
MA (non-socialist pro-smallgov from Sweden) - 13 years ago
My impression after this debate (the first I've seen in presidential run). A few of these, with at least 2/5, I think may have the ability to get popular and beat Obama.
Ron Paul is quite much a non-mature funny ol' man (watching Alex Jones?). *entertainer* Chances: 0/5
Newt Gingrich is good on topics (but sometimes too soft, e g on climate change?). *good guy* Chances: 3/5
Romney is good, but very formal/"correct". (LDS=drawback?) *boring* Chances: 4/5
Huntsman is too left leaning? Very non-immigration? (LDS=drawback?) *strange?* Chances: 1/5
Cain is good in economics and tough on security, but weak knowledge on issues? *sometimes stupidly convinced* Chances: 1/5
Pawlenty might - I'm not sure - be better than one think. He can talk, but needs ..."weight". *strange smile* Chances: 2/5
Santorum always looks as he will any time starts to cry... (but not excluded) *normal guy* Chances: 3/5
Bachmann often knows what to say, but lacks deep knowledge? Weak debating Pawlenty *no president* Chances: 1/5
Thanks for doing Ron Paul a great service by excluding him from your poll. Dishonest actions like these will always backfire. Lesson learned?
Michael Seidl - 13 years ago
I see once again that Dr. Pauls name didn't make it on the voting list. Tisk tisk naughty little poll makers.
RIGHT SCOOP - 13 years ago
We wish to express our sincere regret in excluding Ron Paul's name in our poll but due to overwhelming votes for Ron Paul we felt we had to be fair to the other candidates, also we disagreed with the results so learning from Fox news we decided to manipulate the results to our world view.
Luka - 13 years ago
Rightscoop had to take Ron Paul's name off the poll because he was winning and because they did not like that outcome they had to take his name off. This kind of behavior is quite typical in a totalitarian scenario, don't despair because not including the good doctor renders this poll as trivial and silly.
hawaiisb - 13 years ago
Ron Paul gets my vote. Your poll and now your website does not.
mandy - 13 years ago
Where is the great wise gentleman Dr.Ron Paul @ ?????????
Tritch - 13 years ago
What happened to Ron Paul in this poll? Are we seeing the same ignorance as was used in the last election? Can we not see where that kind of political games has gotten us?
Richard Ravarino - 13 years ago
Ron Paul deserves to be on the list. . . You want to claim it is bots voting for him??? How about an informed American public that is sick of establishment politicians and the status quo. Shame on you!!!
patrick wynn - 13 years ago
AH's you leave the only viable canedate off your list! Not to worry we will kick your butt.
RON PAUL 2012
Raymond - 13 years ago
HAHA! No wonder nobody reads your guy's websites you're a bunch of nuts. Removing a candidate from a poll because you don't like his ideas. Your Orwellianism has ensured I was never again return to this site.
Daniels - 13 years ago
Why was Ron Paul's name removed from this poll? Is it because he was the winner and you guys are trying to skew the results????
Jake Lockley - 13 years ago
Bachman only has healthcare repeal;
Romney is status quo;
Newt is a status quo has been who's clinging;
Paul is doddering and soft;
Pawlenty is weak, petty and political;
Santorum wants Gov to take power from states;
Hunstman is an empty suit;
Herman Cain is the only one who has not said something I disagree with and actually seems to know how to breakdown and analyze a problem and develop a systematic approach to solving them while measuring progress and results.
Donald Trump is not on your voting list. Why not?
My vote is for Donld Trump.
Ron Paul is not on this poll because they want to choose for you.
Ron Paul
You left Rick Perry's name off. What kindergartener made this poll?
We the people are watching you and we are getting stronger everyday!!!!Ron Paul 2012!He will go all the way!!!!!!!!!
It doesn't matter about the removal of Ron Paul, the neocons and military Keynesianists have been doing this for years now and where has it got them. We surround you. You cannot hide the truth any more. Ron Paul 2012!
I also think it was stupid to remove the clown Ron Paul. Just give the readers a hint that The Ron Paul Church is mobilizing, and let it be enough.
Otherwise, if The Ron Paul Church mobilizing here so well that he's get 90 percent, and you cant see the difference between the other candidates, remove him and explain the situation -- i .e. be honest about Ron Pauls figures when you removes him.
The drawback with removal of candidates -- even (or especially) clowns -- is that this, not without some substance, makes the fans of that candidate feeling so much more motivated. I think that J S Mill explained the implications of silencing different views. One have to stick on to free speech (especially for lunatics).
I wondered how in the world could Jon Huntsman be second; he was invisible last night....then I saw Ron Paul supporters were using Huntsman for a protest vote.
Ron Paul is a crazy old coot if it werent for his promise to legalize drugs he wouldn't have a third of his current devotees.
Once and a while he sounds credible when he's talking about personal freedoms in the abstract.....but picturing him on the world stage representing the USA is cringe-worthy to say the least.
Maybe I don't really understand how "bots" work, but I know I had to supply a user name and e-mail address before I could post. Seriously, does anybody buy this "paulbot" crap. With Paul's name removed, I didn't bother to vote "which is clearly the point". So tell me, did a bot leave this comment?! How do you explain this? What about the overwhelming response from the LIVE audiences at the debates...must be bots. Paul is #4 on google trends for most searched...bots right? News anchors are overwhelmed with angry responses and e-mails when they ignore Paul...bots!! There is no evidence, anywhere, that I am aware of, that shows tampering with systems and polls in Paul's favor.
However, there have been several to admit and/or apologize for purposely tampering with and/or outright removing things that show him as favorable; stating concerns over possible tampering as reason, once called on it. Sound familiar? (the removal, not the admitting it part).
U mad bro?
There are no Paul-bots... people online are just more informed than people subjected to mainstream media 24/7. They don't get facts, they get the mainstream media/corporate choice for office.
There were only 8 candidates... Leaving off Ron Paul is completely ignorant and biased.
My vote is for Ron Paul, looks like you don't look like you want my vote or real results in your poll.
Here is a REAL poll: http://www.topix.com/issue/fox/gop-debate-aug11
You say the "Paulbots" manipulated the poll by posting and sharing the link to your poll... An IP address can only be counted once. So if you don't like the results, then guess what. There are more of us now then in 2008. We are not going away. We are getting our country back from the war loving media controlling corporations we are fighting now. You are one of them.
Ron Paul by far is the winner and you not having him on this poll is un-american and down right wrong - help your country - dont mess it up hiding the man who warned us of the 08 crash, this 2011 crash, and is warning us of a future that most citizens are blind to.
Ron Paul 2012..... you losers didn't even include the real winner in your poll.
JOHN HUNTSMAN = RON PAUL FOR POLLS THAT REMOVE HIM
VOTE HUNTSMAN IN PLACE OF PAUL IF THEY REMOVE HIM
JOHN HUNTSMAN = RON PAUL FOR POLLS THAT REMOVE HIM
VOTE HUNTSMAN IN PLACE OF PAUL IF THEY REMOVE HIM
No Dr. Paul?
Evidently, you have realised that leaving him out of the poll is the only way to stop him from winning it!
LOL!
What a farce. Don't even acknowledge the only candidate with any honesty.
Okay. Yes, we censored Ron Paul. Yes, we censored Ron Paul supporters' comments. Yes, we just want Romney to win and the status quo to prevail. So what?
Btw, my 1/5 for Bachmann is because she's like Cain sometimes very one-way "stupid" on some issues, and don't seems to have necessary knowledge. So she can't deliver everytime she's confronted, e g with inconsistency. When she can't answer she's get silent for one or two seconds which is non-convincing, and then she's not deliver good enough. In my view she plunged from 2 to 1, and like e g Cain I think she's not GOP's candidate.
Some candidates I don't know anything about...
My impression after this debate (the first I've seen in presidential run). A few of these, with at least 2/5, I think may have the ability to get popular and beat Obama.
Ron Paul is quite much a non-mature funny ol' man (watching Alex Jones?). *entertainer* Chances: 0/5
Newt Gingrich is good on topics (but sometimes too soft, e g on climate change?). *good guy* Chances: 3/5
Romney is good, but very formal/"correct". (LDS=drawback?) *boring* Chances: 4/5
Huntsman is too left leaning? Very non-immigration? (LDS=drawback?) *strange?* Chances: 1/5
Cain is good in economics and tough on security, but weak knowledge on issues? *sometimes stupidly convinced* Chances: 1/5
Pawlenty might - I'm not sure - be better than one think. He can talk, but needs ..."weight". *strange smile* Chances: 2/5
Santorum always looks as he will any time starts to cry... (but not excluded) *normal guy* Chances: 3/5
Bachmann often knows what to say, but lacks deep knowledge? Weak debating Pawlenty *no president* Chances: 1/5
Thanks for doing Ron Paul a great service by excluding him from your poll. Dishonest actions like these will always backfire. Lesson learned?
I see once again that Dr. Pauls name didn't make it on the voting list. Tisk tisk naughty little poll makers.
We wish to express our sincere regret in excluding Ron Paul's name in our poll but due to overwhelming votes for Ron Paul we felt we had to be fair to the other candidates, also we disagreed with the results so learning from Fox news we decided to manipulate the results to our world view.
Rightscoop had to take Ron Paul's name off the poll because he was winning and because they did not like that outcome they had to take his name off. This kind of behavior is quite typical in a totalitarian scenario, don't despair because not including the good doctor renders this poll as trivial and silly.
Ron Paul gets my vote. Your poll and now your website does not.
Where is the great wise gentleman Dr.Ron Paul @ ?????????
What happened to Ron Paul in this poll? Are we seeing the same ignorance as was used in the last election? Can we not see where that kind of political games has gotten us?
Ron Paul deserves to be on the list. . . You want to claim it is bots voting for him??? How about an informed American public that is sick of establishment politicians and the status quo. Shame on you!!!
AH's you leave the only viable canedate off your list! Not to worry we will kick your butt.
RON PAUL 2012
HAHA! No wonder nobody reads your guy's websites you're a bunch of nuts. Removing a candidate from a poll because you don't like his ideas. Your Orwellianism has ensured I was never again return to this site.
Why was Ron Paul's name removed from this poll? Is it because he was the winner and you guys are trying to skew the results????
Bachman only has healthcare repeal;
Romney is status quo;
Newt is a status quo has been who's clinging;
Paul is doddering and soft;
Pawlenty is weak, petty and political;
Santorum wants Gov to take power from states;
Hunstman is an empty suit;
Herman Cain is the only one who has not said something I disagree with and actually seems to know how to breakdown and analyze a problem and develop a systematic approach to solving them while measuring progress and results.