Generally speaking, is "Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity" a reasonable option to be given to a jury? (poll 5724343)

Generally speaking, is "Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity" a reasonable option to be given to a jury?

No, if a person is "not guilty" they are simply not guilty and should be free.

Yes, because it may be the most accurate outcome.

Yes, because it allows a judge to supervise someone who the prosecution can't prove is guilty, but could still be a threat.

No, it is too easy to fake insanity and then get out of a mental institution.

Vote View Results

See this poll on: https://poll.fm/5724343/embed