Manning is the logical choice if you are looking for a short term QB, however with the youth of the Seahawks and the strength of the draft this year, Luck could head an up and comming team for a decade. I'll take Luck and build a dynasty!
Corey - 12 years ago
I hope people were joking by choosing Tebow, I'd like to think our fanbase isn't really that dumb.
masverde - 12 years ago
How anyone would prefer a QB that is unproven in the NFL over one that has demonstrated he can win is incomprehensible. If it were just about money, then perhaps that would make sense. But if it is about winning the Super Bowl, then you gotta go with Manning (and I am not really a Manning fan). Then you might want to go with either Flynn or Tebow since they have demonstrated they can win in the NFL. As to Griffin and Luck, you select them last based on the type of offense you run.
Jimmy - 12 years ago
Luck definitely. Prototypical pro QB. Comes in at rookie salary and stays for over a decade.
Manning is the logical choice if you are looking for a short term QB, however with the youth of the Seahawks and the strength of the draft this year, Luck could head an up and comming team for a decade. I'll take Luck and build a dynasty!
I hope people were joking by choosing Tebow, I'd like to think our fanbase isn't really that dumb.
How anyone would prefer a QB that is unproven in the NFL over one that has demonstrated he can win is incomprehensible. If it were just about money, then perhaps that would make sense. But if it is about winning the Super Bowl, then you gotta go with Manning (and I am not really a Manning fan). Then you might want to go with either Flynn or Tebow since they have demonstrated they can win in the NFL. As to Griffin and Luck, you select them last based on the type of offense you run.
Luck definitely. Prototypical pro QB. Comes in at rookie salary and stays for over a decade.
No brainer.
Hasselbeck!