I freaking love the current beveled logo and I want aTm to keep it!!!!!. However, I agree with the others in this forum that there should not be so many different logos, like the T-star.
Scott Bowen - 12 years ago
The bevel makes no sense graphically and looks hideous. However if they made one that was "anatomically correct" I would be fine with it. The bigger problem is that it seems like we have dozens of different logos, and little to no brand identity.
Also, get rid of the beveled T-star that athletics uses.
Brandon Lewis - 12 years ago
Will not purposefully buy anything with this ridiculous bevel (which makes no sense graphically speaking)
Mark Burgess - 12 years ago
I prefer no bevel and larger use of "Texas Aggies" labeling. If a bevel must be used figure out another design.
Frank Barat - 12 years ago
I like the non-beveled block ATM on our football helmets and hope those never change, but I'm not really bothered by the bevel on our merchandise. I think it's a relatively small but vocal minority of TexAgers who hate the bevel so much. I never knew it was an issue before joining TexAgs, and I've never heard a non-TexAger complain about it, and most people I've talked to about it didn't even notice the difference. That in and of itself may not be a ringing endorsement of the beveled logo, and I would agree that if we are going to have a bevel I'd prefer an "anatomically correct bevel" where the shadows are consistent with what a beveled "T" should look like (see Texas Tech's double Ts). But honestly, I think the status quo (no bevel on football helmets, beveled T's on logos and merchandise) is just fine, and if we have limited time and resources to solve the marketing and branding issues before us, I would prefer to see those resources spent in other ways.
Bevil evil. Bevil bad. Bevil cheap. Bevil trashy.
I freaking love the current beveled logo and I want aTm to keep it!!!!!. However, I agree with the others in this forum that there should not be so many different logos, like the T-star.
The bevel makes no sense graphically and looks hideous. However if they made one that was "anatomically correct" I would be fine with it. The bigger problem is that it seems like we have dozens of different logos, and little to no brand identity.
Also, get rid of the beveled T-star that athletics uses.
Will not purposefully buy anything with this ridiculous bevel (which makes no sense graphically speaking)
I prefer no bevel and larger use of "Texas Aggies" labeling. If a bevel must be used figure out another design.
I like the non-beveled block ATM on our football helmets and hope those never change, but I'm not really bothered by the bevel on our merchandise. I think it's a relatively small but vocal minority of TexAgers who hate the bevel so much. I never knew it was an issue before joining TexAgs, and I've never heard a non-TexAger complain about it, and most people I've talked to about it didn't even notice the difference. That in and of itself may not be a ringing endorsement of the beveled logo, and I would agree that if we are going to have a bevel I'd prefer an "anatomically correct bevel" where the shadows are consistent with what a beveled "T" should look like (see Texas Tech's double Ts). But honestly, I think the status quo (no bevel on football helmets, beveled T's on logos and merchandise) is just fine, and if we have limited time and resources to solve the marketing and branding issues before us, I would prefer to see those resources spent in other ways.