The new head of the R.C. M. P. stated that he was not going to put up with his members
pulling illegalities anymore, but one of the first things he did was transfer the idiot from
Edmonton to B. C. ( anonymously ), that makes him a definite lier. Now, in the news today, another bone-head is on display in R. C. M. P. boots and birthday suite having a pretend slaughter of a women, along with other gross acts. I understand our elite police
force has already forgiven him, as he was off-duty and not in complete R. C. M. P. dress
uniform, can you believe the stupidity. Watch this incident, as the new R. C. M. P. head
will find a way to quietly move the maniac and it will be dirty business as usual.
joeavg - 12 years ago
RCMP= FarceCMP
Several problems that wont go away anytime soon:
(1) Their union has their hooks in SO deep, they command pretty much anything they demand:
Notice how "silent" the FCMP union has kept in ALL the controversial mayhem that has arisen.
These so-called officers/cadets "Oath of Office" is meaningless.
(2) Upper management, consisting of "old skool" boys likes to have their puppet spokes girls do all the talking looking pretty and using "clear" untethered neutral legal language (ie. bait and switch talk) to confuse the public on the real issues,
(3) ALL the new recruits are educated down the dark and narrow path of controlled and limited info education so that they cannot and do not "rock the boat" as they become FCMP officers. Need to know basis, compartmentization, etc, what ever they call it now.
These new recruits have NO CONCEPT of what a "peace officer" is since the majority of their "pavlov's law" education doesn't even touch on this.
And many think the criticism posted here is harsh?
Look at all the crap citizens have to deal with in their questionable "professional" behavior as decided by their own peers, and the Crown Prosecutors office(who sleeps along side these cowboys) who minimize the penalties to these FCMP people who should obviously be held to a higher standard; yet are not simply because they are "one of ours"...
The new head of the R.C. M. P. stated that he was not going to put up with his members
pulling illegalities anymore, but one of the first things he did was transfer the idiot from
Edmonton to B. C. ( anonymously ), that makes him a definite lier. Now, in the news today, another bone-head is on display in R. C. M. P. boots and birthday suite having a pretend slaughter of a women, along with other gross acts. I understand our elite police
force has already forgiven him, as he was off-duty and not in complete R. C. M. P. dress
uniform, can you believe the stupidity. Watch this incident, as the new R. C. M. P. head
will find a way to quietly move the maniac and it will be dirty business as usual.
RCMP= FarceCMP
Several problems that wont go away anytime soon:
(1) Their union has their hooks in SO deep, they command pretty much anything they demand:
Notice how "silent" the FCMP union has kept in ALL the controversial mayhem that has arisen.
These so-called officers/cadets "Oath of Office" is meaningless.
(2) Upper management, consisting of "old skool" boys likes to have their puppet spokes girls do all the talking looking pretty and using "clear" untethered neutral legal language (ie. bait and switch talk) to confuse the public on the real issues,
(3) ALL the new recruits are educated down the dark and narrow path of controlled and limited info education so that they cannot and do not "rock the boat" as they become FCMP officers. Need to know basis, compartmentization, etc, what ever they call it now.
These new recruits have NO CONCEPT of what a "peace officer" is since the majority of their "pavlov's law" education doesn't even touch on this.
And many think the criticism posted here is harsh?
Look at all the crap citizens have to deal with in their questionable "professional" behavior as decided by their own peers, and the Crown Prosecutors office(who sleeps along side these cowboys) who minimize the penalties to these FCMP people who should obviously be held to a higher standard; yet are not simply because they are "one of ours"...
(4)