Neither. We need to consider what is in the best interests of the chiled, which thankfully, the courts have done, and have upheld. The parents are self-serving, and only seeking to avoid a murder charge. After what they have done, they should have no say in this at all. Which is more inhumane, leaving a child on life-support without prospect of recovery, or letting her pass into heaven?
Neither. We need to consider what is in the best interests of the chiled, which thankfully, the courts have done, and have upheld. The parents are self-serving, and only seeking to avoid a murder charge. After what they have done, they should have no say in this at all. Which is more inhumane, leaving a child on life-support without prospect of recovery, or letting her pass into heaven?