If it's a boy

2 Comments

  • K - 11 years ago

    Not Charles for sure, stuffy like Elizabeth is. Something more modern like the parent are. Start a new line of Royal names for the first name anyway. Tradition can follow for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th names

  • Pet - 11 years ago

    Please not John. A royal male baby who went by John would have to be a model of perfection and goodness given the track record of the one and only John who preceded him on the English throne.

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment