Senator Rand Paul has back bone out of the three ! He nailed Hillary on the Benghazi Massacre cover up hearing also.
winifred Thomas - 11 years ago
I like Ron Paul to be President
Gary A. A nderson - 11 years ago
NONE!
BarbaCat - 11 years ago
No more Bushes, and it's not time for a good and strong woman to butt heads with Hillary. I wish it was, but it's not...yet. Rand Paul worries me, but he intrigues me at the same time. Most important to me is this: He doesn't seem to fear the Obama machine...yet.
It's still early.
Bill - 11 years ago
ENOUGH OF THE BUSHES. WE HAVE ALL KINDS OF GOOD CANDIDATES THAT WE COULD ELECT.
FOR SOME REASON ALL OF THE NEWS MEDIA ARE PUSHING JEB BUSH AND WILL NOT LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE THAT WILL NOT VOTE FOR HIM...........
Of the three choices, none of them may have the "charisma" to win now but if they get national exposure the choice for me would be Jeb Bush, Susanna Martinez, Rand Paul. Paul constantly puts one foot in his mouth and the other foot you know where all the time and that will be exploited mercilessly by the Dems. Look what happened in 2012 to 2 squeaky clean candidates Romney and Ryan. They should have beem elected but the Dem steamroller just crushed their campaign right from the get go when the secretly recorded statement by Romney about the 47% that he was not going to try to attract in his campaign was released. The Republicans are going to have to do the same thing against the Democrats even if the mainstream press is against them. They have to. They have to take the gloves off and beat them to a pulp which won't be easy if the economy does not come crashing down like it did in 1929. I just remember the photograph from the depression which showed a bread line of men under a billboard that had the words "World's highest standard of living". If there is any issue which can possibly destroy the next Dem candidate for the presidency it would be UNEMPLOYMENT none of which have been addressed by Obama adequately. He doesn't give a hoot about the unemployed finding a job and why should he be because he is just fine with keeping them on welfare to be at the mercy of the political process and the never ending battle between the Dems and the Reps knowing full well that if he cuts welfare millions will be angry as hell (because there are no jobs for them to fill) and will vote for whoever is the Republican candidate in 2016. HOWEVER, IF THE REPUBLICANS MAKE THE CUTS WHILE THERE ARE NO JOBS AVAILABLE THERE WILL BE DISASTER FOR THEM IN 2016. Just as in 2008 when a little known senator from Illinois became the Dem nominee over Hillary Clinton, there is still enough time left for another candidate to have a national impact strong enough to do the same in 2016.
PapaBC - 11 years ago
Governor Jeb Bush Never
Rand _ Yes
Martinez - Yes
We have had enough Clintons - Bushes - Obamas to last my life time.
Time to restore America.
Leon - 11 years ago
Jeb is not the idiot his brother is (not even close) - he is smart, successful and can speak in public. He should have been #43. Let's hope he's #45.
Senator Rand Paul has back bone out of the three ! He nailed Hillary on the Benghazi Massacre cover up hearing also.
I like Ron Paul to be President
NONE!
No more Bushes, and it's not time for a good and strong woman to butt heads with Hillary. I wish it was, but it's not...yet. Rand Paul worries me, but he intrigues me at the same time. Most important to me is this: He doesn't seem to fear the Obama machine...yet.
It's still early.
ENOUGH OF THE BUSHES. WE HAVE ALL KINDS OF GOOD CANDIDATES THAT WE COULD ELECT.
FOR SOME REASON ALL OF THE NEWS MEDIA ARE PUSHING JEB BUSH AND WILL NOT LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE THAT WILL NOT VOTE FOR HIM...........
Of the three choices, none of them may have the "charisma" to win now but if they get national exposure the choice for me would be Jeb Bush, Susanna Martinez, Rand Paul. Paul constantly puts one foot in his mouth and the other foot you know where all the time and that will be exploited mercilessly by the Dems. Look what happened in 2012 to 2 squeaky clean candidates Romney and Ryan. They should have beem elected but the Dem steamroller just crushed their campaign right from the get go when the secretly recorded statement by Romney about the 47% that he was not going to try to attract in his campaign was released. The Republicans are going to have to do the same thing against the Democrats even if the mainstream press is against them. They have to. They have to take the gloves off and beat them to a pulp which won't be easy if the economy does not come crashing down like it did in 1929. I just remember the photograph from the depression which showed a bread line of men under a billboard that had the words "World's highest standard of living". If there is any issue which can possibly destroy the next Dem candidate for the presidency it would be UNEMPLOYMENT none of which have been addressed by Obama adequately. He doesn't give a hoot about the unemployed finding a job and why should he be because he is just fine with keeping them on welfare to be at the mercy of the political process and the never ending battle between the Dems and the Reps knowing full well that if he cuts welfare millions will be angry as hell (because there are no jobs for them to fill) and will vote for whoever is the Republican candidate in 2016. HOWEVER, IF THE REPUBLICANS MAKE THE CUTS WHILE THERE ARE NO JOBS AVAILABLE THERE WILL BE DISASTER FOR THEM IN 2016. Just as in 2008 when a little known senator from Illinois became the Dem nominee over Hillary Clinton, there is still enough time left for another candidate to have a national impact strong enough to do the same in 2016.
Governor Jeb Bush Never
Rand _ Yes
Martinez - Yes
We have had enough Clintons - Bushes - Obamas to last my life time.
Time to restore America.
Jeb is not the idiot his brother is (not even close) - he is smart, successful and can speak in public. He should have been #43. Let's hope he's #45.