Do you support an "Assault Weapons" ban such as the one that Diane Feinstein is proposing?

7 Comments

  • Ronald Birkes - 11 years ago

    These AR 15 's have been around since 1963. If they would spend the same amount of time and effort on the economy it would be great. Stupidity reins in the Senate

  • Roberta Porter - 11 years ago

    Excellent, Mr. Larson, just plain down excellent. Can't think of anything to add to your comments other than 'AMEN'.

  • Rob Turner - 11 years ago

    Anyone who does not believe this kind of stuff is just the beginning is an absolute idiot. Sorry, folks, but we are headed for war, right here and right now.

  • Eric Pierce - 11 years ago

    Screw her and the Unicorn she rode in on. Sen. Feinstein would not know a true assault weapon if it walked up and bit her.

  • Cherry - 11 years ago

    Durbin also said that AR-15 was used in the school shooting, which is a lie!

  • Joseph Larson - 11 years ago

    Senator Cruz is correct in his position that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are not limited only to a few chosen by congress. All legal citizens of this Union are born with those rights and laws guaranteed to them. It is only by an individuals misconduct, thru anti-social behavior that any of those rights can be removed. Senator Feinstein and some other elected elite would chose to limit those rights to those that fit their idea of entitled and all the rest of us can go climb a rope. Sorry, senator you climb the rope, we will keep our guns as the Dick Act of 1902 says we can.

  • Joseph Larson - 11 years ago

    First of all the senior senator from CA. is not a respecter of the constitution, nor does she really understand why our founding fathers wrote the Bill of Rights. As too our Supreme Court, they have proven time and time again that they do not understand that they only determine the constitutionality of legislation coming out of our congress, they do not make law. SO here is the bottom line, Each of us as citizens of the United States of America owe it to ourselves to study the Constitution, take classes if need be, but how ever we do it, we need to understand what our Constitution and our Bill of Rights should mean to us. Then when we are schooled on those right and obligations, we can apply this knowledge to our choices at the voting polls. If no qualified candidate, (a determination that you make from your understanding of the law and the needs of the country for good and proper representation) we are to step forward and offer out service. If such service is rejected and it becomes unbearably obvious the country is at peril, then we must organize what ever resistance it takes to correct the direction our country is going in. If our government refuses to listen, as President John Kennedy told us, we may have to take up arms to make the corrections. We first try to make the changes in our own understanding with increased knowledge and increased participation, then if need be we use force. May God give us the strength and wisdom to do what is right. I heard two senators who have been in office too long to remember they serve, they are not the master. Durbin's statement that none of the rights of the Bill of Rights are absolute is an example of his being out of touch with reality.

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment