Car Clash: 2014 Camaro vs. 2013-2010 Camaro

4 Comments

  • Andrew - 11 years ago

    I like the front for the most part, it makes the car look slimmer and sleeker (which in my view means less weight = faster) but not by much. Unfortunately those tail lights have to go, they are terrible. you should have just touched up the pervious tail lights(like you did with the front) or made them round.

  • Ray - 11 years ago

    The grille of the car is actually not that great looking anymore. I feel as if the car is squinting now instead of having that aggresive face with those halos. As far as the tail lights go i agree with all of these posts here, that the tail lights actually are hideous and they do not suit the vehicles muscle car appearance at all! I do however like the Recaro seats that can be added onto the car and the re-introduction of the Z28. Other than that i was expecting HP increase and new features such as use of LEDs as the tail lights and DRL's and maybe guidelines for the back up cam that is now intergrated in the center screen.

  • shawn - 11 years ago

    the front isnt so bad but its still not as attractive as the 10-13 models..and who in the hell designed and authorized those hideous taillights?? those are a miserable fail

  • Ike - 11 years ago

    New front hides too much of the uniquely desirable LED Halos. Top grill should at least, be large enough to show off the 'eyes'. Tail lights took a step backwards. Should have just switched to LED Sequential and LED DRLs. How about a turbo V6 with performance exhaust and CAI?
    Just increased the value of my 2013....

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment