Do you think the re-enactment will help or hurt the prosecution?

7 Comments

  • Skip Hayes - 11 years ago

    Some one needs to ask a Forensics Expert just how many fingerprints are generally foundy on firearms. The surface of most modern weapons are not IMO conducive to finding fingerprints. All my semi-automatics have a textured finish and do not take good fingerprints.

  • Joseph Jasper, MD - 11 years ago

    There were not worse lacerations, or abrasions likely because Zimerman was conscious and using his neck muscles, arms and torso muscles to prevent getting his head injured. Had he been unconscious the same force of being slammed could have been severely damaging and fatal. One is not obligated to sustain a life threatening injury to sense mortal danger in order to defend. If one senses immediate life threatening danger he is justified in defending himself.
    The neighborhood had been experiencing break-ins. That justifies a homeowner to own weapons, form a neighborhood watch and provide the timely defense of person and property that the police cannot.

  • susan regdos - 11 years ago

    I have witnessed a few head injuries in past years, and only one out four had a small incision, that did not need to be stitched, out of these head injuries, ALL were labeled with a slight to moderate concussion, with slamming, or hitting head, on Brick, or concrete slab, ....Certainly not all falls, car accidents, fights, punching, and accidents, produces visiable marks, or bruises...This is a true Fact. George Zimmerman had Much fear for his Life, he was dazed by the blow to the NOSE, than the Head being slammed into the slab of concrete, this caused him to panic and defend himself. He is Not guilty, Justice is served,,,,,, Thank You Greta for another Great Show, appreciate the Intelligence you bring to FOX News, Your investigation reporting is Wonderful with Great Intelligence. I also enjoy Your guests, not just as Lawyers, with Intelligence but their respectable demeanor, with Great Character. a Fan .

  • Bob - 11 years ago

    One of my favorite rants - the liberal controlled media, television news, newspapers, magazines, radio; all continue to show 12 year old Trayvon; NOT 17 year old Trayvon.

    They continue to show the 5 year old picture BECAUSE it helps to cement in your mind the cute, little, hoodie-wearing youngster who was stalked by this monster Zimmerman.
    .
    In reality "little Trayvon" at the time of his death stood almost 6'2" tall and weighed 175 muscular pounds. He had numerous run ins with authorities (both at school and local police), had been stopped and almost arrested two days before his death for smacking a bus driver in the face, because the driver refused to let him ride for free. He was released because the driver was told not to press charges by the bus company and to continue on his route.

    When "little Trayvon" was suspended at school it was not only because he tried to bring a little marijuana in with him, he was in possession of wedding rings and other jewelry, watches, etc. that he said he "found" along with a large screwdriver while on the way to school that day. The jewelry was turned over to the Police by the school.
    Not a single paper will admit that this kid was a marijuana dealer.
    >His friends on Facebook all say he had the "best plants". Not a single paper will show you any of his recent photos where he shows off a mouthful of gold teeth and all of his tattoos.

    Not a single newspaper will tell the news like it really is....and NOT how they want you to think it is...

    President Obama looked at the FIVE year old photo the media chose to show the Nation and said, "If I had a son...he would look like Trayvon.." So from that comment should I assume you did not bother to look for the facts in this shooting..or should I assume you want a son who is a 17 year old drug dealing, gold teethed, tattooed thug whose name on one of his facebook profiles was "Wild Nigga" who 'finds" jewelry and burglary tools on the way to school?

  • Garry Clark - 11 years ago

    In an era in which confidence in government is at an all-time low, the state through the state judge tells a jury that they should disregard the truth they heard should guarantee a not guilty verdict. After seeing that stupidity, I ask, "What is government hiding in its prosecution of Zimmerman?" Further, I wonder if government is prosecuting Zimmerman because of his hispanic race or because of Martin's race? Regardless, it is clear to me that the prosecution is a racial prosecution with the state laboring to hide truth.

  • nancyskz - 11 years ago

    I personally have had concussions with NO marks on my head and had my head smashed repeatedly with no marks and yet had a cracked skull. This is so bizzare because they were inflicted by someone else and I WAS afraid I would surely die. No one unless they have had their head beaten in and or your face also being injured has a clue. I was afraid I would die and let me tell you.........you are experiencing pain and absolute fear!

  • JOE SADIE - 11 years ago

    THE PICTURES YOU ARE SHOWING OF MARTAN ARE OLD PICTURES WHY ARE YOU NOT USING UP TO DATE PICTURES. SECOND WHY DO ALL THE LAWYERS PLAYING THE MARTAN SIDE; OH POOR YOUNG BLACK MAN.

    YOU NEED TO BE TALKING ABOUT MARTAN BACKGROUND WITH GANGS; HOW ABOUT WHAT HE POSTED ON THE INTERNET.

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment