Should non-members get some party features?

1 Comment

  • Barbara - 10 years ago

    Obviously, paying members should get the 'lion's' share of benefits.

    However, non-paying members often contribute a great deal to CP. For example, I gave over 125,000.00 for the charities last month.
    If non-members all left CP the game would suffer a lot, because of the interactions such as conversations, duel people playing games, etc.

    Non-members contribute by finding glitches ( I wrote support this month about an error in defend the mainframe game).
    Also by advocating for very young members ( I have had long discussions with support concerning how difficult it is to become friends of 'mascots', and therefore doubly so for very young players etc.).

    And least anyone forget, some non-paying members could come into a 'windfall' one day and have sufficient cash to join. If they have gotten bored by the incredible gap members vs. non-members, the may go to a different site.

    Also I believe CP is responsible for teaching some values considering the amount of money they gain. As it stands now, the message is: A person is not valuable unless they have money. The poor must always dress in rags, have an almost bare igloo home etc.

    It is true parents should be the main source of teaching values, but to demonstrate compassion, generosity , etc. is never a bad thing.

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment