A very hard decision to make Vasquez loves the city and was very excited when he was traded to the team from the begining and also has a killer shot....I dont see KD coming to Toronto regardless of the friendship between the two. I dont see KD leaving the Thunder with the team and chemistry he has over there. Now Patterson has a physical approach to the rim and also has a decent shot, which is why I voted for Patterson. The Raptors have a ton of shooters already on the team and they can't always rely on the jump shot rather then attacking the rim......I wonder how the fans will react if Vince Carter returns!
bryan - 10 years ago
No one loves the city more than vasquez... no one. How do you let a guy like that go. He should be starting 2 guard and move t ross to 6th man. As we've seen having 2 ball handlers on the court has been great for the raptors
Kollin - 10 years ago
It is tough to find a stretch 4 like Patterson, but it is even harder to find a quality backup PG of General Grevious quality and upside, so I would have to go with Vasquez. Àlso, he is our best chance of attracting Durant, a slim chance, but you never know.
Dr.Scooby - 10 years ago
Love what both these guys bring and ideally I would bring both back if $$ weren't an issue; however Vasquez, despite his defensive holes and an eye cringing floater, brings a versatility to the team as he can be very effective in T.O.'s two guard lineup as the primary ball-handler or as an SG. He can hit 3pt shots in bunches and can score driving to the net.
C-Low - 10 years ago
Gotta go with Vasquez. Our team could sustain an injury in the front court much more than we could afford to lose our back up PG. Vasquez has also been usable alongside lowry which gives us some versatility. I also believe GV will come cheaper. Realistically we should keep both let T-Hans go.
If Lowry gets hurt and we let GV walk who's gonna step in??
Jay - 10 years ago
BOTH
Andrew - 10 years ago
Stretch 4's are becoming more and more common. I think GV has a lot of Manu in him. PG depth and 6th man of the year potential that GV has is more impt to keep than what PP offers. And I do like PP. If I have to go with one, it's an easy choice.
A very hard decision to make Vasquez loves the city and was very excited when he was traded to the team from the begining and also has a killer shot....I dont see KD coming to Toronto regardless of the friendship between the two. I dont see KD leaving the Thunder with the team and chemistry he has over there. Now Patterson has a physical approach to the rim and also has a decent shot, which is why I voted for Patterson. The Raptors have a ton of shooters already on the team and they can't always rely on the jump shot rather then attacking the rim......I wonder how the fans will react if Vince Carter returns!
No one loves the city more than vasquez... no one. How do you let a guy like that go. He should be starting 2 guard and move t ross to 6th man. As we've seen having 2 ball handlers on the court has been great for the raptors
It is tough to find a stretch 4 like Patterson, but it is even harder to find a quality backup PG of General Grevious quality and upside, so I would have to go with Vasquez. Àlso, he is our best chance of attracting Durant, a slim chance, but you never know.
Love what both these guys bring and ideally I would bring both back if $$ weren't an issue; however Vasquez, despite his defensive holes and an eye cringing floater, brings a versatility to the team as he can be very effective in T.O.'s two guard lineup as the primary ball-handler or as an SG. He can hit 3pt shots in bunches and can score driving to the net.
Gotta go with Vasquez. Our team could sustain an injury in the front court much more than we could afford to lose our back up PG. Vasquez has also been usable alongside lowry which gives us some versatility. I also believe GV will come cheaper. Realistically we should keep both let T-Hans go.
If Lowry gets hurt and we let GV walk who's gonna step in??
BOTH
Stretch 4's are becoming more and more common. I think GV has a lot of Manu in him. PG depth and 6th man of the year potential that GV has is more impt to keep than what PP offers. And I do like PP. If I have to go with one, it's an easy choice.