Cute photo but I also agree with Tamika voysey comment.
Christal Lisherness - 10 years ago
Being a little stupid aren't we Facebook? I'd say YES!
Jeanine TJADEN - 10 years ago
There are way worse pics, comments that are posted on Facebook. I understand that they are trying to be safe as in regards to the protection of children. However, this mothers intentions were innocent and not endangering her children. Take a peek at some of the other pics that are inappropriate on FB. Take a peek at the kids that have lied about how old they are and posting on FB. There are a whole lot of other prevalent things to take care of FB.
Mom of 2 - 10 years ago
First off the Coppertone ad was cute b/c a dog/puppy was pulling down the bathing suit and I had a dog that did almost the same to my 9 yr old a couple of years ago and I laughed b/c of the Coppertone ad.
To me this picture is in poor taste/judgment altogether as it appears "staged" and I do not raise my kids to take off or pull down/on ANYBODY else's clothes as that could lead to inappropriate actions or behaviors
& to agree with others, there are just flat out SICK people in this world today so I would NEVER post a pic of my child's exposed "private" body parts online as even if it were set to private I would still be concerned about someone "hacking" the site, link, etc and obtaining it
Tamika voysey - 10 years ago
Hi, I personally wouldn't post this as there sadly are many pedophiles on Facebook that would find this photo great to look at.
Minus the sick minded men/women, I think it's a cute photo.
Carole - 10 years ago
2 questions for Facebook - 1. I just want to know why such an uproar is being made about a picture (taken and posted by the own girls mother) deserves a suspension of any sorts? I remember the copper tone baby add just because of the life size beach towel i used to always demand be brought whenever my parents took us swimming. Kudos to mom on her reenactment , I say. 2. How is it that a child's hiney because it was posted through fb can grab national attention. But nothing have I seen been done about a cabbie murder filmed by a taxi cab cam that I viewed on my fb page just because a friend commented on it.
N, I do mean the full shooting n robbery of some poor man. Now don't you think something like that is a little more deserving of your attention!
But track - 10 years ago
All I saw was a smiley face bathing suit ....seriously I think you're all nuts..my God, find something important to comment on...this is so silly.
Pam - 10 years ago
The people that are complaining are probally perverts theirselves. And believe me Catholics sure are not innocent. I was raised Catholic and 90% of them are perverts. Leave the innocent picture alone. Its just like a Norman Rockwell drawing. People now days are sick and have a one track mind..if you don't like it don't look at it. Are they jealous because it wasn't their child in the picture? Grow up people. Let the innocent little kids be. The grown ups that where bathing suits now days hardly have anything on and you want to complain about an innocent photograph.
sandy - 10 years ago
the only reason I find this inappropriate is because of the fact that as it may be harmless to the many of us, there is that group of pedophiles that like to look at children, there for this pic as innocent as it may be does spark debate. I personally would not post something like that involving my kids.
Patti - 10 years ago
It's unfortunate that our society can make something so innocent be so ugly! Shame in us!
Josef Davis - 10 years ago
Since when did FACEBOOK get so righteous? The 'PRUDE' that complained about this photo has a very large problem. Lots of time and no life of their own. 90% of FACEBOOKS customers feel that FACEBOOK was wrong yet FACEBOOK ALLOWS language that so few use it in public. GET A LIFE ! What if, for the sake of speaking, that the 90% stopped using FACEBOOK? My, my, what would FACEBOOK say then?
Serena - 10 years ago
Those advertisements have ben used for years. We all remember it. If it had frontal nudity, I would deem it inappropriate, but it's not. We see and hear worse that that on TV. It was harmless, and those that say otherwise are the real problem.
Andrea Posivak - 10 years ago
Adults ware suits that show more than that!
Carol - 10 years ago
Tough call! If the privacy settings for the picture were for friends only then I see no problem with it. But if the settings were public then it would seem inappropriate. There are too many perverts on the internet and I would not want them viewing my child's pictures even if they are innocent.
Heidi - 10 years ago
Things are getting ridiculous with these religious nuts protesting innocent photos of little kids. They are making something innocent dirty, get your minds out of the gutter !!!
Cute photo but I also agree with Tamika voysey comment.
Being a little stupid aren't we Facebook? I'd say YES!
There are way worse pics, comments that are posted on Facebook. I understand that they are trying to be safe as in regards to the protection of children. However, this mothers intentions were innocent and not endangering her children. Take a peek at some of the other pics that are inappropriate on FB. Take a peek at the kids that have lied about how old they are and posting on FB. There are a whole lot of other prevalent things to take care of FB.
First off the Coppertone ad was cute b/c a dog/puppy was pulling down the bathing suit and I had a dog that did almost the same to my 9 yr old a couple of years ago and I laughed b/c of the Coppertone ad.
To me this picture is in poor taste/judgment altogether as it appears "staged" and I do not raise my kids to take off or pull down/on ANYBODY else's clothes as that could lead to inappropriate actions or behaviors
& to agree with others, there are just flat out SICK people in this world today so I would NEVER post a pic of my child's exposed "private" body parts online as even if it were set to private I would still be concerned about someone "hacking" the site, link, etc and obtaining it
Hi, I personally wouldn't post this as there sadly are many pedophiles on Facebook that would find this photo great to look at.
Minus the sick minded men/women, I think it's a cute photo.
2 questions for Facebook - 1. I just want to know why such an uproar is being made about a picture (taken and posted by the own girls mother) deserves a suspension of any sorts? I remember the copper tone baby add just because of the life size beach towel i used to always demand be brought whenever my parents took us swimming. Kudos to mom on her reenactment , I say. 2. How is it that a child's hiney because it was posted through fb can grab national attention. But nothing have I seen been done about a cabbie murder filmed by a taxi cab cam that I viewed on my fb page just because a friend commented on it.
N, I do mean the full shooting n robbery of some poor man. Now don't you think something like that is a little more deserving of your attention!
All I saw was a smiley face bathing suit ....seriously I think you're all nuts..my God, find something important to comment on...this is so silly.
The people that are complaining are probally perverts theirselves. And believe me Catholics sure are not innocent. I was raised Catholic and 90% of them are perverts. Leave the innocent picture alone. Its just like a Norman Rockwell drawing. People now days are sick and have a one track mind..if you don't like it don't look at it. Are they jealous because it wasn't their child in the picture? Grow up people. Let the innocent little kids be. The grown ups that where bathing suits now days hardly have anything on and you want to complain about an innocent photograph.
the only reason I find this inappropriate is because of the fact that as it may be harmless to the many of us, there is that group of pedophiles that like to look at children, there for this pic as innocent as it may be does spark debate. I personally would not post something like that involving my kids.
It's unfortunate that our society can make something so innocent be so ugly! Shame in us!
Since when did FACEBOOK get so righteous? The 'PRUDE' that complained about this photo has a very large problem. Lots of time and no life of their own. 90% of FACEBOOKS customers feel that FACEBOOK was wrong yet FACEBOOK ALLOWS language that so few use it in public. GET A LIFE ! What if, for the sake of speaking, that the 90% stopped using FACEBOOK? My, my, what would FACEBOOK say then?
Those advertisements have ben used for years. We all remember it. If it had frontal nudity, I would deem it inappropriate, but it's not. We see and hear worse that that on TV. It was harmless, and those that say otherwise are the real problem.
Adults ware suits that show more than that!
Tough call! If the privacy settings for the picture were for friends only then I see no problem with it. But if the settings were public then it would seem inappropriate. There are too many perverts on the internet and I would not want them viewing my child's pictures even if they are innocent.
Things are getting ridiculous with these religious nuts protesting innocent photos of little kids. They are making something innocent dirty, get your minds out of the gutter !!!