See this poll on: https://poll.fm/8456249/embed
Give others the chance to vote.
Share this poll, because the more votes the better.
Create your own.
Opinions! We all have them. Find out what people really think with polls and surveys from Crowdsignal.
closed
Why would you not want your fellow Americans to have health care? Maybe if you're evil and have no compassion you would think that way, but that would surprise me because we Americans stick together, don't we?
Public schools are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. They are a threat to personal liberty. Why should we pay for them, let alone insurance for school employees?
I don't believe in gay.
We are talking about public service employees who work for us and NOT some corrupt union and I have no desire to pay for their benefits when I have no say in the amount and cost of said benefits.
Them queers is gunna be gettin my insheranse? Wut's this werld gunna cum two next? Perty soon them's gonna be allowerd to vote to!!!!
ken, insurance for straight couples comes out of taxpayers' pockets. Even insurance at private companies comes out of our pockets because those benefits aren't taxed.
SCHOOLS where CHILDREN are taught? CHILDREN who might be swayed to the gay agenda? No. Gays and the muslims cannot just steal our rights as Americans from us like that. We will protect our children.
It blows my mind that anti-gay people still exist what the hell it's almost 2015 shut the actual fuck up.
So, when will you poll if interracial couples, mixed or black folks should get insurance? Or maybe poll if we should stop giving insurance to straight couples? >
Is this a real question, in 2014? Next we'll be asked whether mixed-race couples deserve health benefits.
Ken, do you think gay people don't pay taxes?
Actually, this will be at NO additional cost to the taxpayers.
Out of the taxpayers pocket ? Oh! Like affordable healthcare [Obama Care]. It seems like teachers, fireman, police men, postal workers, city and federal employers don't mind having Obama Care.
There's literally no reason why insurance should be offered to one married couple but not another.
Then by your logic, Ken, the insurance for straight couples shouldn't come out of the taxpayer's pockets either.
As long as it doesn't come out of the taxpayer's pockets, I don't see a problem