Domestic Violence Prevention Evaluation
The issuance of a restraining order stopped the abuse
The issuance of a restraining order escalated the abuse
The court adhered to CA family code 3011 (e) when issuing the restraining order which specifies : "(e) (1) Where allegations about a parent pursuant to subdivision (b) or (d) have been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint custody to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing or on the record. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the children"
The court failed to adhere to CA family code 3011 (e) when issuing the restraining order which specifies: "(e) (1) Where allegations about a parent pursuant to subdivision (b) or (d) have been brought to the attention of the court in the current proceeding, and the court makes an order for sole or joint custody to that parent, the court shall state its reasons in writing or on the record. In these circumstances, the court shall ensure that any order regarding custody or visitation is specific as to time, day, place, and manner of transfer of the children"
The court addressed new incidences of domestic violence immediately once the restraining order was issued.
The court did not address new incidences of domestic violence immediately once the restraining order was issued.
Children were protected from further exposure to domestic abuse
Children were not protected from further exposure to domestic abuse
Vote
See this poll on:
https://poll.fm/8560105/embed
