Should the Kirkgate Tusk be removed?

6 Comments

  • Duncan - 9 years ago

    Charitably Chas called a 'tusk' but more resembling a rusty needle, given the longstanding importance of the kirkgate to trade, and its once key use as a corridor taking you to the river - could we at least have something that at reflects an element of local culture and history?

    How about a Leith quality framework to stop developers ploping rubbish (and rubbish art) in our public realm?

  • The Arabian Knight - 9 years ago

    Show some imagination and move (Leith born) Paolozzi's foot sculpture from outside St Mary's Cathedral to its rightful place at the 'Foot of the Walk'

  • Mary Moriarty - 9 years ago

    IF VOTED TO BE RETAINED SOME HANGING BASKETS OR SIMILAR FLORAL INTERTWINNED ON THE NARWAL MIGHT HELP IT BE MORE ATTRACTIVE AM SURE CROPS AND POTS IN LEITH COULD DO SOME
    FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS THERE,

  • Sam - 9 years ago

    It turned, predictably, into a public pissoir as soon as it was installed, so they had to put the ugly railings on it to stop people going inside. It has always been an eyesore and is now scruffy, vandalised and falling apart at the tip. It was a disgraceful waste of money moving the Queen Victoria statue and plinth a few meters to make way for this badly made, badly designed and entirely unloved bit of 'public art'. Get rid of it. Sooner the better.

  • Michael - 9 years ago

    Take it down, it is indeed ugly and if it is there to commemorate whaling it is a monument to barbarity. Creative 'greening' needed.

  • Lindsey Dunbar - 9 years ago

    It should go; it's ugly . Put some greenery in instead , plants and tress would be welcome .

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment