The new $10 bill

10 Comments

  • Maria - 9 years ago

    Leave it alone! The face in the bill was created many yrs. ago so do not change it. The Face on the $10 Bill is there for a reason. I agree with many other comments before me who also state similar views as mine. Stop spending money on something that isn't broke, when the money can be spent on many other needed & more important causes. Please stop listening to the minority. This is another way to spend more money on trivial issues that are not broke & not doing work on real issues that are really & can actually help people.

  • Alexander Hamilton - 9 years ago

    When they can find someone who has done as much as the person that they want to replace,THEN,it might be
    time to think about it. Btw,for the girl who SUPPOSEDLY asked why there wasn't a woman on any of the money
    why didn't someone give her a bag of Susan B. Anthony quart,...er,...ah,....I mean Dollars? A.H.

  • Bronson - 9 years ago

    Leave it alone. If it ain't broke...if you're gonna put a woman, I nominate Pamela Anderson to replace Hamilton.

  • A Wise American - 9 years ago

    I wish the government would spend money more responsibly. This is your money they have agreed to waste on this idea. There are so many more important issues that need our money and attention.This reminds me of the times the states want to change the color of vehicle license plates.. What for?
    My message to elected officals: spend our money on things that help people and society. Our infrastructure is worn ,our people are hungry. My message to voters: please get a list of your politicians that support this foolishness and do not support them in the next election.

  • Gary Kevin Ware - 9 years ago

    Sherry Carl is right and Steve Trujillo is wrong. We need to stop pandering to special interest groups, even if they are half of the population. For better or worse, it is men who are the active members of society and the founders of our nation. Of course, in an ideal society, there would be no paper currency, and contrary to what Diane Lee says, education is not a proper function of the government.

  • Maggie Lawrence - 9 years ago

    I agree with Sherry Carl. This is just another politically correct - and expensive - way to pander to interest groups. If a new denomination were necessary, I have no problem with introducing a woman's portrait whose contributions were important to the history of our country and government- Abigail Adams, perhaps. But it seems the interest groups want a woman's portrait just for the sake of a woman's portrait. I believe that's called sexism.

  • Michael Brant - 9 years ago

    74% say "Leave It Alone"??
    Wow! Quite a male viewership!

  • Diane Lee - 9 years ago

    I think we should spend our money in other places that are more valuable than changing the face on our currency. For example, we could spend the money on education to better educate our children to help ensure a better quality of life for their generation.

  • steve trujillo - 9 years ago

    I wish people like Sherry Carl would wake the hell up and recognize that women are HALF the US population, and were highly responsible for the formation of our nation. we don't need the man who fought a duel with Aaron Burr to prove his supposed honor on our money.

  • Sherry Carl - 9 years ago

    I wish the government would quit pandering to interest groups. Founding Fathers are important and their faces on our currency is the only way some people ever even know of them.. Honor other people in other ways. Leave the currency alone.

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment