I'm really enjoying the theme/design of your web
site. Do you ever run into any browser compatibility problems?
A couple of my blog audience have complained about my site not operating correctly
in Explorer but looks great in Firefox. Do you have any tips to help
fix this issue?
Nate - 8 years ago
All around seems to be the complete package: firepower, med, phone back up battery and who doesn't love the coffee cup!
Laura McQuaig - 8 years ago
I would love to see you do this for women sometime.
Kyle Meier - 8 years ago
43 makes the most sense as an all round carry
Andy B - 8 years ago
I would choose #3. That is the best balance of firepower and concealability of the three.
Rick - 8 years ago
The M&P would be my choice.
Tim - 8 years ago
#3. It just makes more sense to me not to be overloaded with too much gear while going through your day.
Tim - 8 years ago
#3. It ju
Ron Singell - 8 years ago
I believe 1 is a more rounded edc package. Plus the belt pouch really gives you easily changed our options.
David F. - 8 years ago
Option #3 is definitely what I would go with as it is a compact easy to carry package but still capable of quick reloads and striker fired capabilities. Option #1 has far superior firepower but I'd be lying if I said I could carry that load out everyday and still manage to stay under the radar. I just don't have enough wheel gun experience to feel confident carrying #2 but that knife is saweet!
Hank - 8 years ago
I am a big fan of the Glock 43. My current EDC is a Glock 19, but as an LEO I'm not as worried about absolute concealability as some are. My next purchase will definitely be the 43.
Matthew locke - 8 years ago
The M&P set up is the one one of the three you would want to have in a gun fight IMO. Much greater fighting capabilities.
E Lee - 8 years ago
I'm a M&P guy, but setup 3 seems closer to what I'd do... knife, light, blaster, and IFAK. I am very happy to see emphasis on EDC that includes an IFAK of some kind, since this is an oft-neglected area of the firearms community which typically prefers to focus on the other hardware...
Good stuff!
William Vance - 8 years ago
I think the easier (that is smaller and lighter) equipment is to carry, the more likely it is to be carried. I like EDC package two because it is simple, effective, and minimal.
Eric Glover - 8 years ago
The M&P 9 would fit anyones hands, has the capacity, sight radius to for that accurate 25 yard shot if need be and its made in America!!
Greg Piwowarczyk - 8 years ago
#3 It seems the most versatile weather you are dressed in shorts and t-shirt for warm weather or more layers or heavier clothes she n colder weather. It will work for any style you wear,there for the same load out the less chance of not grabbing an item..
John - 8 years ago
The first one because he also has a fixed blade.
Daniel jacques - 8 years ago
The glock 43 load out makes the most sense to me. I would personally prefer a S&W shield but that's just my preference.
Joe Turner - 8 years ago
Appendix carry fits my everyday carry options the best. I like not worrying about imprinting with appendix carry and even with layers I can get to my pistol quickly.
I'm really enjoying the theme/design of your web
site. Do you ever run into any browser compatibility problems?
A couple of my blog audience have complained about my site not operating correctly
in Explorer but looks great in Firefox. Do you have any tips to help
fix this issue?
All around seems to be the complete package: firepower, med, phone back up battery and who doesn't love the coffee cup!
I would love to see you do this for women sometime.
43 makes the most sense as an all round carry
I would choose #3. That is the best balance of firepower and concealability of the three.
The M&P would be my choice.
#3. It just makes more sense to me not to be overloaded with too much gear while going through your day.
#3. It ju
I believe 1 is a more rounded edc package. Plus the belt pouch really gives you easily changed our options.
Option #3 is definitely what I would go with as it is a compact easy to carry package but still capable of quick reloads and striker fired capabilities. Option #1 has far superior firepower but I'd be lying if I said I could carry that load out everyday and still manage to stay under the radar. I just don't have enough wheel gun experience to feel confident carrying #2 but that knife is saweet!
I am a big fan of the Glock 43. My current EDC is a Glock 19, but as an LEO I'm not as worried about absolute concealability as some are. My next purchase will definitely be the 43.
The M&P set up is the one one of the three you would want to have in a gun fight IMO. Much greater fighting capabilities.
I'm a M&P guy, but setup 3 seems closer to what I'd do... knife, light, blaster, and IFAK. I am very happy to see emphasis on EDC that includes an IFAK of some kind, since this is an oft-neglected area of the firearms community which typically prefers to focus on the other hardware...
Good stuff!
I think the easier (that is smaller and lighter) equipment is to carry, the more likely it is to be carried. I like EDC package two because it is simple, effective, and minimal.
The M&P 9 would fit anyones hands, has the capacity, sight radius to for that accurate 25 yard shot if need be and its made in America!!
#3 It seems the most versatile weather you are dressed in shorts and t-shirt for warm weather or more layers or heavier clothes she n colder weather. It will work for any style you wear,there for the same load out the less chance of not grabbing an item..
The first one because he also has a fixed blade.
The glock 43 load out makes the most sense to me. I would personally prefer a S&W shield but that's just my preference.
Appendix carry fits my everyday carry options the best. I like not worrying about imprinting with appendix carry and even with layers I can get to my pistol quickly.