The little man is a Democrat. One could expect him to be dishonest.
John - 8 years ago
He was no less biased toward Clinton than any of the other so-called moderators. I found it extremely distasteful when he called Trump a liar for his previous debate reference to Aleppo. Mr. Trump you lied about Aleppo during the last debate so would you please tell everyone you lied and why you lied. Aleppo wasn't annihilated as you said Mr. Trump. If that wasn't anti-Trump then clearly it's all just a misunderstanding. I am fairly certain he never called Hillary a liar although she did seem to lie when she opened her mouth. I am curious why he forgot what his job was. Isn't a moderator supposed to simply ask the question to both candidates and give them the time limits and then tell them to stop once time expires. I wasn't aware that a moderator was part of the debate and could interject questions to one candidate, but not the other. I mean if he could call Trump a liar he should have called Hillary a liar and asked her to admit it as well.
marge - 8 years ago
i thought he was bias to hillerey he gave her more talking time and let her rebutt the questions he just cut trump off, also it was very unfair of him to ask that question of would he support hillerey if she won.he should have said where are all my fellow republicans who did not sup
port me.
Donna LEDoux - 8 years ago
I do believe Chris was fair but I do wish he wouldn't have let Hillary escape 2 very important questions... she side stepped them 2 times and still Chris didn't take her back to the question.
Wendy - 8 years ago
Even though he seemed to favor Hilary, he was so much better then the past two debates.
Lisa - 8 years ago
Chris did not ask Mrs Clinton if she would accept Mr.Trump's presidency. I find that to be rather presumptive for him to ONLY ask Mr Trump if he would accept hers.
Terry - 8 years ago
Of all the moderators we've endured in the past debates, I think Chris Wallace did the best job of all. He didn't correct or argue with the candidates as had several of the past moderators done with Trump. He just seemed to be more in control and he seemed as if he wanted to keep it as fair as possible. Perhaps he didn't follow up as well as he could/should have but he wanted to get to other issues so he kept it moving along. I liked what he did tonight. Trump won.
Connie - 8 years ago
Clinton was given WAY more time to speak than Trump. At one point when Wallace told Clinton her time was up, she refused to stop talking, she just went on and on. Trump was trying to speak because it was his turn but he could not be heard because Clinton would NOT shut up. And Wallace allowed it. Clinton appeared drugged. Check out her enlarged pupils in a close-up photo (very enlarged just like at the prior debates). Clinton's constant head movements were also strange.
Angie San Antonio - 8 years ago
Chris Wallace is just another lie like Hillary. You gave more time to Hillary, you did not press Hillary to answer, you always interrupt Trump, etc. you are all bought. Disgusting media.
Monika DeRouse - 8 years ago
Chris Wallace was more fair than the previous two moderators. However, he still leaned in favor of HRC. Kudos to Chris for asking about the WikiLeaks He did attempt to get her to stop talking when she went over time, but far less than he did Trump. Trump was the winner - he kept his cool, only said a few stupid things "hombres" and "biggity" for example. HRC seemed rattled a number of times, pivoted away from the questions, did not seem as "Presidential" as some have called her performances.
Robert Ray - 8 years ago
People can kiss his ass he was bias in my opinion, the moderator should have not been anyone from the media but should have been a undecided independent voter
Lynn Newkirk - 8 years ago
He was bias. He said before hand it wasn't his job to fact check. Really he fact checked Trump but never fact checked Hillary. Why did he bring up the tape of Donald but nothing of the new woman today for Bill? He was sitting Trump up for Hillary. He let Hillary go on and go and interrupted Trump. So much for Fox news being fair and balance.
Marjorie - 8 years ago
Wallace always gave the witch extra time to tell her lies and cut Trump off before his 2 minutes were up. Not fair coverage at all. At least Wallace did ask more relevant questions than the past 2 debates but I couldn't stand to listen to her going on and on and on so cut away before the end. Not that anything she said was going to change my mind on who I am voting for. One scary woman. I want to see the CORRUPTION in our gov gone and she is not the answer!!!
NORMA GEANE - 8 years ago
I FEEL HE GAVE HILLARY MORE TIME BUT WE WILL SEE WHEN THE FACT CHECKERS DO THE FAIR TIME THING
Jc - 8 years ago
Biased. Wallace was in favor of her. She had way more time.
Amy - 8 years ago
Why did Hillary not have to answer the question about Bill?
Sue - 8 years ago
so biased
I heard him call trump a liar
And never questioned or fact checked Hillary
Large issue with negative trump accusations
No negative for Hillary
I had no idea he was another Clintonite
Sue - 8 years ago
so biased
I heard him call trump a liar
And never questioned or fact checked Hillary
Large issue with negative trump accusations
No negative for Hillary
I had no idea he was another Clintonite
The little man is a Democrat. One could expect him to be dishonest.
He was no less biased toward Clinton than any of the other so-called moderators. I found it extremely distasteful when he called Trump a liar for his previous debate reference to Aleppo. Mr. Trump you lied about Aleppo during the last debate so would you please tell everyone you lied and why you lied. Aleppo wasn't annihilated as you said Mr. Trump. If that wasn't anti-Trump then clearly it's all just a misunderstanding. I am fairly certain he never called Hillary a liar although she did seem to lie when she opened her mouth. I am curious why he forgot what his job was. Isn't a moderator supposed to simply ask the question to both candidates and give them the time limits and then tell them to stop once time expires. I wasn't aware that a moderator was part of the debate and could interject questions to one candidate, but not the other. I mean if he could call Trump a liar he should have called Hillary a liar and asked her to admit it as well.
i thought he was bias to hillerey he gave her more talking time and let her rebutt the questions he just cut trump off, also it was very unfair of him to ask that question of would he support hillerey if she won.he should have said where are all my fellow republicans who did not sup
port me.
I do believe Chris was fair but I do wish he wouldn't have let Hillary escape 2 very important questions... she side stepped them 2 times and still Chris didn't take her back to the question.
Even though he seemed to favor Hilary, he was so much better then the past two debates.
Chris did not ask Mrs Clinton if she would accept Mr.Trump's presidency. I find that to be rather presumptive for him to ONLY ask Mr Trump if he would accept hers.
Of all the moderators we've endured in the past debates, I think Chris Wallace did the best job of all. He didn't correct or argue with the candidates as had several of the past moderators done with Trump. He just seemed to be more in control and he seemed as if he wanted to keep it as fair as possible. Perhaps he didn't follow up as well as he could/should have but he wanted to get to other issues so he kept it moving along. I liked what he did tonight. Trump won.
Clinton was given WAY more time to speak than Trump. At one point when Wallace told Clinton her time was up, she refused to stop talking, she just went on and on. Trump was trying to speak because it was his turn but he could not be heard because Clinton would NOT shut up. And Wallace allowed it. Clinton appeared drugged. Check out her enlarged pupils in a close-up photo (very enlarged just like at the prior debates). Clinton's constant head movements were also strange.
Chris Wallace is just another lie like Hillary. You gave more time to Hillary, you did not press Hillary to answer, you always interrupt Trump, etc. you are all bought. Disgusting media.
Chris Wallace was more fair than the previous two moderators. However, he still leaned in favor of HRC. Kudos to Chris for asking about the WikiLeaks He did attempt to get her to stop talking when she went over time, but far less than he did Trump. Trump was the winner - he kept his cool, only said a few stupid things "hombres" and "biggity" for example. HRC seemed rattled a number of times, pivoted away from the questions, did not seem as "Presidential" as some have called her performances.
People can kiss his ass he was bias in my opinion, the moderator should have not been anyone from the media but should have been a undecided independent voter
He was bias. He said before hand it wasn't his job to fact check. Really he fact checked Trump but never fact checked Hillary. Why did he bring up the tape of Donald but nothing of the new woman today for Bill? He was sitting Trump up for Hillary. He let Hillary go on and go and interrupted Trump. So much for Fox news being fair and balance.
Wallace always gave the witch extra time to tell her lies and cut Trump off before his 2 minutes were up. Not fair coverage at all. At least Wallace did ask more relevant questions than the past 2 debates but I couldn't stand to listen to her going on and on and on so cut away before the end. Not that anything she said was going to change my mind on who I am voting for. One scary woman. I want to see the CORRUPTION in our gov gone and she is not the answer!!!
I FEEL HE GAVE HILLARY MORE TIME BUT WE WILL SEE WHEN THE FACT CHECKERS DO THE FAIR TIME THING
Biased. Wallace was in favor of her. She had way more time.
Why did Hillary not have to answer the question about Bill?
so biased
I heard him call trump a liar
And never questioned or fact checked Hillary
Large issue with negative trump accusations
No negative for Hillary
I had no idea he was another Clintonite
so biased
I heard him call trump a liar
And never questioned or fact checked Hillary
Large issue with negative trump accusations
No negative for Hillary
I had no idea he was another Clintonite