Should President Trump fight the courts over this decision?

14 Comments

  • thetsa kner - 7 years ago

    He needs to let the liberals have this small win.Make a new executive order that is in more detail.

  • thetsa kner - 7 years ago

    He needs to let the liberals have this small win.Make a new executive order that is in more detail.

  • Carol Reifschneider - 7 years ago

    If Mr. Trump backs down now - he is breaking a major campaign promise to keep us safe.

  • Shannon - 7 years ago

    He CANNOT back down! The second "they" get their way, they will never stop! He needs to win and keep winning to shut the Dems down!

  • Catgy - 7 years ago

    Rewrite the extreme vetting ban and make sure it's airtight! Let those libtard boil in their own piss.

  • Arizona - 7 years ago

    The rule of law will prevail. The US Constitution is ironclad & steadfast.

  • Karen Wilkinson DiVincenzo - 7 years ago

    He should scrap the EO and have it rewritten by AG Jeff Sessions to ensure it is iron clad. It will take too long to battle the original EO in court.

  • Daniel Munyon - 7 years ago

    Now that our President has an AG his executive order should be reviewed. After review the AG should return to the appeals court first. But perhaps the executive order could be reviewed and re-written so our country can be protected now. Then take the courts on in defense of the constitution.

  • Kenny - 7 years ago

    It would probably be better to just make another EO. I understand that it could take up to two years to resolve this one.

  • Susan Chrislip - 7 years ago

    President Trump should absolutely fight this all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States of America!!! ???????? He is trying to keep ALL Americans safe from the terrorists, even the ones fighting his Executive Order! They need to open their eyes & ears and realize this fact! God bless the U.S.A.! ????????????

  • Terry Gupton - 7 years ago

    All this B/S is to stop President Trump at the cost of the Safty of the American people

  • Karen Distefano - 7 years ago

    These 3 judges are not upholding the Constitutional right if the President. If He doesn't win then our Constitution means nothing and now everything will be contested! Isn't the constitution the final say??? I want an answer to this question. If it is, then why is it not being referenced and the judges referencing it? Now does this go to Supreme Court? Is that the final court to make decision? This just opens doors for all President Trump's decisions to now be tied up in court!

  • Karen Distefano - 7 years ago

    These 3 judges are not upholding the Constitutional right if the President. If He doesn't win then our Constitution means nothing and now everything will be contested! Isn't the constitution the final say??? I want an answer to this question. If it is, then why is it not being referenced and the judges referencing it? Now does this go to Supreme Court? Is that the final court to make decision? This just opens doors for all President Trump's decisions to now be tied up in court!

  • yelena smetsky - 7 years ago

    Even Syrian President agrees that there are some terrorists among peaceful refugees. It took only 15 terrorists to create 9/11 nightmare. Numbers of terrorists are not a matter any more . Their dedication to the purpose is fanatic. The only way to get rid of danger is to create a significantly thorough vetting process. Whomever is voted against this ban either wants to have them here for certain purpose ( members of establishment) or totally zombied by mediam

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment