Does the new travel ban go far enough?

11 Comments

  • Karen DePaulKarem - 7 years ago

    Listen rhe ban is a start, there can always be more added. Iraq was taken off because they ( Iraq) have a vetting process in place. There waa also a cap put on the amount of people entering. Better somthing in place then NOTHING in place. Respect the fact that this man is doing everything in his power to keep things under control, which is way more then the last presidet.

  • Glenna Barnes - 7 years ago

    I understand that President Trump is negotiating to get any ban in place. But isn't Iraq one of the worst ISIS countries? I do Trust him so maybe he has something up his sleeve.

  • Angela Monaghan - 7 years ago

    U.S. First! President Trump wants to Make America Great Again! Let him do his job. Travel Ban isn't strict enough. Preventing Attacks is the goal. As far as the refugees, NONE!

  • Beachbumpkin - 7 years ago

    Very upset and concerned that Iraq was removed from the ban. 120 day hold on Syrians is not enough. I had hopes that because of the time it was taking to write this new ban, it would be much more stiff than it is. I am concerned the stones are getting soft.

  • Debra Jonas - 7 years ago

    This is good and a compromise and it's moving in the right direction. I liked the first Executive order but we now have to learn to do whatever it takes to move forward.

  • Jennifer Flowers - 7 years ago

    I'm in the minority voting YES. Anything is better than nothing at this point. Getting it passed then adding to it later may be an easier to deal with the 'opposition' (left). Love your work DML!

  • joanne ward - 7 years ago

    I don't understand the refugee ban, why does he feel like he will get some more problems in court...Obama made an order to let so many in why is it difficult to not allow them to enter now...out government needs to have congress put in a good law about the amount of people we allow to enter and no more...

  • Caroline - 7 years ago

    It's interesting to me, if you check history, there was a Total ban of immigration to this country right after World War II and nobody ever mentions it.

  • Brenda - 7 years ago

    I voted no only because there wasn't HELL NO as a choice. Why do we have beg to feel/be safe in OUR COUNTRY?. Why are our doors wide open for people who want to kill us? This makes no sense, does our government want another 9/11 or worst

  • Randi - 7 years ago

    Welll, I do think it's a start. It's not terribly bad, yet it's not all that we need either. But I am grateful Trump is doing this and I think people will start to take him seriously if he keeps this up and we'll see a drop in abuse of the immigration system. However, if I had it my way, I would put a hault to ALL immigration immediately for an indefinite amount of time. We've got too many people and the amount keeps pouring in ... abuse of our kindness has been happening too long

  • Karen Prewitt - 7 years ago

    120 days I don't feel is adequate I think the band should be longer and also cover a greater number of countries due to the fact that so many terrorists inclined people have already dispersed around the world. Therefore they could be coming from any place and there are so many that hate America and what we stand for one nation under God

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment