When The Russians offered incriminating evidence on an American citizen Trump could have just ignored it...
Just like the Obama administration did when the Russians tried to warn them about the Boston bombers ...
( sarcasm )
Crystal Leslie - 7 years ago
I believed he felt he was doing his job, so taking the meeting, which by the way went nowhere was the right decision!
Sue Benner - 7 years ago
Of course I would have met with the Russian attorney. With ALL of the underhanded crap the DNC was pulling, hell yea DML! Also, I pray everyday for your health.
Laurie Thompson - 7 years ago
I would have met with the Russian attorney. Byt, I would have made sure to have my own attorney with me.
Pam Howard - 7 years ago
Is it illegal to meet with a foreign person if offered info. If not I probably would meet and then check on any info to make sure it was TRUE before saying anything.
joseph litus - 7 years ago
absolutely no!...Trump did not need any dirt from a questionable source, as Killery's past, her involvements and links to Russia, her close ties to Obummer's anti American agenda,etc.etc. ARE ALL TRUMP NEEDED TO EXPOSE WHICH HE WAS DOING. no need TO EXPOSE HIMSELF OR ANY PLATFORM MEMBER TO POSSIBLE PROBLEMS, ESPECIALLY WITH THE DEMS. and MSM DOING ALL THEY COULD AT THE TIME TO FABRICATE and confuse..
Tommie Campbell - 7 years ago
I voted yes. Of course I'd take it if I thought I could get any dirt on Hillary! He didn't know he was being setup by the dems, Hillary, Obummer, and Lynch. All of this crap that is going on is getting to be more and more idiotic with each passing hour. I am sick of it. Never in my 72 yrs. have I seen such crazy things going on with the politics like we have today. It's all so uncalled for. Trump was voted in by a landslide and we the people just want him to be able to run our country and make it great again. I'm at the point that I don't even watch the news anymore. All I rely on is what DML puts out. And of course being a FB fan I see all the other crap that is put out there. I'm sure all the other countries think we have gone nuts here in the US. Thank goodness our president is visiting with these countries and trying to make friends with them. And what about the young people and I don't mean the snowflakes. They are beyond help, but I mean like my teenage grandchildren. What they are hearing and seeing is not what they should be hearing and seeing at all. I'll get off my soapbox now. I hate politics and a lot of those crazy dems.
Amy - 7 years ago
I hate Hillary Clinton. I'd have gone to Russia to get the info if I thought it'd bury her.
Patricia Forquer - 7 years ago
Think back to the date and the timeline, which is why I answered yes. But then I tried to remember what DML said & when he said it. Remember when he told us ( well before the Russia drip, drip, drip) on a W&T how the Left & the media was going to make this administrations tenure all about RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA! For some reason I think "someone" from the Left & the HATE TRUMP media must have been watching and is now using THAT as their "Poison Arrow" to keep stabbing at POTUS and his administration, to keep them off message, distract from the administrations successes, and keep driving home their hate for this President by attacking everyone & everything they do. And it's not going to stop. Trey Gowdy said it best "Everyone close to the president or the campaign needs to be rounded up & put in a room & told `from the time you saw Dr Zhivago until the moment you had vodka with a guy named Boris, you list every single one of those incidents and we're going to turn those over to the special council ".
Janet Skortz - 7 years ago
I said no because I think out of the box. What is she wanting from me and how honest are the people involved. I received great advice watch your back, take the time to investigate before you jump that septic system is deep.
Ron - 7 years ago
I voted yes. After Bill Clinton's Moscow speech, the 500K donation to the Clinton Foundation for Uranium One rights and the smear campaign they were running who wouldn't take that meeting. Then to find out it was a setup by Lynch and Obama who granted her a "parole" visa, I'd have ended it after 20 minutes too.
M.A. White - 7 years ago
And every single lib out there frothing at the mouth, not to mention any so-called journalist, would have done the exact same thing. Much ado about nothing!
Shirley Blanchard - 7 years ago
i voted yes putting myself in the perspective view of a politician. As an everyday Joe, I can't say.
robert v. costa jr - 7 years ago
he went into this meeting thinking he was going to get information on clinton campaign , he did not divulge any
information on america. he finds out the meeting is a set up to look like collusion with the russians , and walks out nothing was discuss about campaigns so what are they looking for , another distraction to slow down the things that need to be addressed for the american people it is ridiculous.
Lucretia Wrolstad - 7 years ago
Its all about getting the "dirt" on the opponent to know what you are up against.
When The Russians offered incriminating evidence on an American citizen Trump could have just ignored it...
Just like the Obama administration did when the Russians tried to warn them about the Boston bombers ...
( sarcasm )
I believed he felt he was doing his job, so taking the meeting, which by the way went nowhere was the right decision!
Of course I would have met with the Russian attorney. With ALL of the underhanded crap the DNC was pulling, hell yea DML! Also, I pray everyday for your health.
I would have met with the Russian attorney. Byt, I would have made sure to have my own attorney with me.
Is it illegal to meet with a foreign person if offered info. If not I probably would meet and then check on any info to make sure it was TRUE before saying anything.
absolutely no!...Trump did not need any dirt from a questionable source, as Killery's past, her involvements and links to Russia, her close ties to Obummer's anti American agenda,etc.etc. ARE ALL TRUMP NEEDED TO EXPOSE WHICH HE WAS DOING. no need TO EXPOSE HIMSELF OR ANY PLATFORM MEMBER TO POSSIBLE PROBLEMS, ESPECIALLY WITH THE DEMS. and MSM DOING ALL THEY COULD AT THE TIME TO FABRICATE and confuse..
I voted yes. Of course I'd take it if I thought I could get any dirt on Hillary! He didn't know he was being setup by the dems, Hillary, Obummer, and Lynch. All of this crap that is going on is getting to be more and more idiotic with each passing hour. I am sick of it. Never in my 72 yrs. have I seen such crazy things going on with the politics like we have today. It's all so uncalled for. Trump was voted in by a landslide and we the people just want him to be able to run our country and make it great again. I'm at the point that I don't even watch the news anymore. All I rely on is what DML puts out. And of course being a FB fan I see all the other crap that is put out there. I'm sure all the other countries think we have gone nuts here in the US. Thank goodness our president is visiting with these countries and trying to make friends with them. And what about the young people and I don't mean the snowflakes. They are beyond help, but I mean like my teenage grandchildren. What they are hearing and seeing is not what they should be hearing and seeing at all. I'll get off my soapbox now. I hate politics and a lot of those crazy dems.
I hate Hillary Clinton. I'd have gone to Russia to get the info if I thought it'd bury her.
Think back to the date and the timeline, which is why I answered yes. But then I tried to remember what DML said & when he said it. Remember when he told us ( well before the Russia drip, drip, drip) on a W&T how the Left & the media was going to make this administrations tenure all about RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA! For some reason I think "someone" from the Left & the HATE TRUMP media must have been watching and is now using THAT as their "Poison Arrow" to keep stabbing at POTUS and his administration, to keep them off message, distract from the administrations successes, and keep driving home their hate for this President by attacking everyone & everything they do. And it's not going to stop. Trey Gowdy said it best "Everyone close to the president or the campaign needs to be rounded up & put in a room & told `from the time you saw Dr Zhivago until the moment you had vodka with a guy named Boris, you list every single one of those incidents and we're going to turn those over to the special council ".
I said no because I think out of the box. What is she wanting from me and how honest are the people involved. I received great advice watch your back, take the time to investigate before you jump that septic system is deep.
I voted yes. After Bill Clinton's Moscow speech, the 500K donation to the Clinton Foundation for Uranium One rights and the smear campaign they were running who wouldn't take that meeting. Then to find out it was a setup by Lynch and Obama who granted her a "parole" visa, I'd have ended it after 20 minutes too.
And every single lib out there frothing at the mouth, not to mention any so-called journalist, would have done the exact same thing. Much ado about nothing!
i voted yes putting myself in the perspective view of a politician. As an everyday Joe, I can't say.
he went into this meeting thinking he was going to get information on clinton campaign , he did not divulge any
information on america. he finds out the meeting is a set up to look like collusion with the russians , and walks out nothing was discuss about campaigns so what are they looking for , another distraction to slow down the things that need to be addressed for the american people it is ridiculous.
Its all about getting the "dirt" on the opponent to know what you are up against.