To those saying if they didnt have access to firearms in the first place they couldnt have shot anyone; you're right. But you forget there are other ways to cause terror like knives, bombs, fire, vehicular attacks the list goes on. Lets not forget those jerks at columbine had set explosives that thankfully failed to detonate.
A law abiding person with no intention to cause harm removing an object that could be used defensively destroying their personal property is their own decision. I just hope that unarmed people and mr LaRogue are never in real situations where they wish they had what they do not.
Peggy - 6 years ago
Lol what a pathetic loser. Probably likes the pickle surprise too.
Wobbs - 6 years ago
Dibs on ammo!
Melinda - 6 years ago
Of course it's the person behind the gun that is responsible for shooting people. BUT...if the perpetrator didn't have access to the guns in the first place...HE COULDN'T SHOOT ANYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AZ Native - 6 years ago
Cars accidents kill tens of thousands every year. Let’s see you cut your cars in half. Moron!
Ken - 6 years ago
Artificial intelligence is no match for his natural stupidity! What about the box cutters that brought down the Twin Towers? Should we saw our box cutters into also?
Bob Bobberson - 6 years ago
Unless this guy was planning on using his AR-15s for committing crimes whats the point other than to get his 5 minutes of fame on the news. You sir are being played by the liberal mainstream media.
Gary - 6 years ago
How exactly is destroying guns that will never be used in a mass shooting going to stop the next mass shooting? Unless the owner has something he wants to admit to.
Michael S. - 6 years ago
So if mass shooters start using bolt action rifles and revolvers, is he going to destroy the ones he owns? This is ridiculous, other than throwing money away, I'm not sure exactly what he accomplished by sawing his AR-15 rifles in half.
Steve Hensyel - 6 years ago
So his other weapons are ok or morally better for home protection?
Angelina - 6 years ago
Thank you.
Chris - 6 years ago
He can do what he wants them. There are his but i still believe it's not the gun its the person behind the gun.
To those saying if they didnt have access to firearms in the first place they couldnt have shot anyone; you're right. But you forget there are other ways to cause terror like knives, bombs, fire, vehicular attacks the list goes on. Lets not forget those jerks at columbine had set explosives that thankfully failed to detonate.
A law abiding person with no intention to cause harm removing an object that could be used defensively destroying their personal property is their own decision. I just hope that unarmed people and mr LaRogue are never in real situations where they wish they had what they do not.
Lol what a pathetic loser. Probably likes the pickle surprise too.
Dibs on ammo!
Of course it's the person behind the gun that is responsible for shooting people. BUT...if the perpetrator didn't have access to the guns in the first place...HE COULDN'T SHOOT ANYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cars accidents kill tens of thousands every year. Let’s see you cut your cars in half. Moron!
Artificial intelligence is no match for his natural stupidity! What about the box cutters that brought down the Twin Towers? Should we saw our box cutters into also?
Unless this guy was planning on using his AR-15s for committing crimes whats the point other than to get his 5 minutes of fame on the news. You sir are being played by the liberal mainstream media.
How exactly is destroying guns that will never be used in a mass shooting going to stop the next mass shooting? Unless the owner has something he wants to admit to.
So if mass shooters start using bolt action rifles and revolvers, is he going to destroy the ones he owns? This is ridiculous, other than throwing money away, I'm not sure exactly what he accomplished by sawing his AR-15 rifles in half.
So his other weapons are ok or morally better for home protection?
Thank you.
He can do what he wants them. There are his but i still believe it's not the gun its the person behind the gun.
His gun and his money. His choice.