What do you think about Peer Review of Science Research?
It's vital for quality control and this justifies the cost of journal subscriptions
It's vital for quality control, but doesn't justify the cost of journal subscriptions
It's not really an effective way of achieving quality control, and should be replaced by something different
It's a complete waste of time: quality is better assessed by citation impact or community reviewing
I don't know
Vote
View Results
See this poll on:
https://poll.fm/5499291/embed
Leave a Comment
Your Name
Please enter your name.
Email Address
Please enter your email address.
Your Website (optional)
Your Comment
Please enter a comment.
0
/4000 chars
Submit Comment
Leave a Comment