This is really getting insane. Of course it’s wrong to start trying to cancel the 45 year career of someone based on accusations that are made in an attempt only to extort money from
A dead mans estate. Anyone who believes this bullshit film hasn’t done any research besides watch a mo vie.
Will - 5 years ago
Is it weird to sleep with young children of no relation, I think it is and is it weird to make new, younger kid friends when the ones you got start hitting puberty? Sure it is, why would you do that? It's a terrible thing to suspect a woman's lying about a rape but when it's Michael Jackson (who's a saint) you just KNOW all those children were full of it since Micheal's interest in them was so normal. It's good they're pulling his music, I never much cared for it anyway.
This is the civil version of my Facebook comment:
When film critics cease screening the work of odious filmmakers (DWGriffith, I'm looking at you) and Americans stop worshipping at the alter of the slaveholding Founding Fathers, then we can discuss an embargo against a dead man following allegations of misconduct.
Magical - 5 years ago
why would anyone do that based on a movie with lies? The man was acquitted of ALL charges in court years ago - with one of the accusers now testifying under oath that nothing inappropriate happened. So why would any station convict an innocent man based on some lies? There's no trial - Michael can't defend himself in court anymore - so why the public lynching of an acquitted man?
Yvonne - 5 years ago
The man is innocent, he fought it in court and won! For fuck sake will ye leave the man to rip ????????????
Ren - 5 years ago
People are being brainswashed by tv and media and take a one sided film that has done no research on the subject or the accusers. Accusers have filed their first civil case against MJ Estate for $$ in 2013. This has been ongoing until 2018. In that time they were re-submitting their cases multiple times, each time contradicting themselves. They were thrown out of court twice for lying in sworn testimony, submitting forged evidence and witholding information from the court. Leaving Neverland is nothing new, just rehashed version of events they tried to peddle in court already and were thrown out for a reason. This film reeks of inconsistencies, timeline loopholes bigger than Texas and simply provable lies.
This is really getting insane. Of course it’s wrong to start trying to cancel the 45 year career of someone based on accusations that are made in an attempt only to extort money from
A dead mans estate. Anyone who believes this bullshit film hasn’t done any research besides watch a mo vie.
Is it weird to sleep with young children of no relation, I think it is and is it weird to make new, younger kid friends when the ones you got start hitting puberty? Sure it is, why would you do that? It's a terrible thing to suspect a woman's lying about a rape but when it's Michael Jackson (who's a saint) you just KNOW all those children were full of it since Micheal's interest in them was so normal. It's good they're pulling his music, I never much cared for it anyway.
This is the civil version of my Facebook comment:
When film critics cease screening the work of odious filmmakers (DWGriffith, I'm looking at you) and Americans stop worshipping at the alter of the slaveholding Founding Fathers, then we can discuss an embargo against a dead man following allegations of misconduct.
why would anyone do that based on a movie with lies? The man was acquitted of ALL charges in court years ago - with one of the accusers now testifying under oath that nothing inappropriate happened. So why would any station convict an innocent man based on some lies? There's no trial - Michael can't defend himself in court anymore - so why the public lynching of an acquitted man?
The man is innocent, he fought it in court and won! For fuck sake will ye leave the man to rip ????????????
People are being brainswashed by tv and media and take a one sided film that has done no research on the subject or the accusers. Accusers have filed their first civil case against MJ Estate for $$ in 2013. This has been ongoing until 2018. In that time they were re-submitting their cases multiple times, each time contradicting themselves. They were thrown out of court twice for lying in sworn testimony, submitting forged evidence and witholding information from the court. Leaving Neverland is nothing new, just rehashed version of events they tried to peddle in court already and were thrown out for a reason. This film reeks of inconsistencies, timeline loopholes bigger than Texas and simply provable lies.