St. Louis displaced the homeless living under the Tucker bridge, your thoughts? Pick only one: (Poll Closed) (poll 3197528)

St. Louis displaced the homeless living under the Tucker bridge, your thoughts? Pick only one: (Poll Closed)

The city shouldn't replace Tucker so the homeless can stay in place. 1% (2 votes)
The homeless had to go so Tucker can be replaced. 46% (96 votes)
The homeless had to go, but the city could have been more sensitive to their needs. 12% (25 votes)
Larry Rice used the issue just to raise a stink. 32% (68 votes)
Larry Rice was the only person to stand up for the rights of the homeless. 2% (5 votes)
Unsure/no opinion 3% (6 votes)
Other 4% 8 votes

Total Votes: 210

Karen - 14 years ago

Hmmm...The notorious Larry Rice. Well there's a saying we use in Christian circles, " You can be heavenly bound but no earthly good." Larry Rice has his own motivations. He has a building, a quite filthy building at that, to maintain, quite a few buildings come to think of it, a TV station and other holdings that just like for everyone else take MONEY to run. While money needn't always be the primary motivating factor, MONEY is still a necessary aspect of life. If you think it's not well there could be a place for you right under that same bride.

Anywho, living under a bridge is no way to live. In fact, protesting at city hall doors year after year after year for 25 years becomes counter productive. It's time to produce and impact lasting change. Larry Rice needs to improve or change his modus operandi to help others improve their way of life.