Do you object to full-body scanners?

1 Comment

  • Steve - 14 years ago

    Let me see if I have this right.

    2 million passengers per day (in the US only) for the past 9 years (since 9/11) equals about 6.5 BILLION passengers.

    One nut tries to blow up a plane with explosives in his underwear which failed. (BTW: You can’t put enough explosives in your underwear to down a plane) and now OUR GOVERNMENT wants to strip search or physically pat down all AMERICAN travelers at a cost of BILLIONS of dollars.

    Non-metallic weapons are bullsh**. Nobody can get in the cockpit anymore. Maybe they could harm another passenger? Is this a realistic threat?

    Nobody has been killed by terrorists on an American aircraft since 9/11!

    Also - TSA (or DfT) has never caught a terrorist - ever!

    Odds: 1 in 6.5 billion ? or less? the bombs didn't work!
    Powerball 1 in 40 million?
    State lottery 1 in 14 million.

    I'm 465 times more likely to win the state lottery, than to be killed by terrorists on a plane!

    ... ARE OUR LEGISLATORS SMOKING?

    Billions to strip search Air Travellers? Teachers all over the country out of work?
    Cities & Towns going bankrupt?

    What about the 300,000 killed in car crashes in the same period?

    What's wrong with this picture?

    Join us on Facebook:
    All Facebook Against Airport Full Body Scanners

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment