TCEQ has now ADMITTED that it does NOT any statutory authority to create or initiate creation of a water district in a PGMA that pre-dates Senate Bill 2 (2001). TCEQ is merely using one of its' own adopted rules. However, the statutory law that allows the TCEQ to use their own rule when there is no specific law in place also states that there must be a citation to the statutory law in the Commission adopted rule... otherwise the commission adopted rule is void. There is NO citation... in a nutshell... TCEQ has no legal basis in statutory law or Commission adopted rule... hence the ALJ should dismiss this case. Let see what kind of a judge we have here. Crooked is as crooked does.
JW - 13 years ago
Convince me that I need to be taxed and regulated by another entity. When cities, like Lakeway, opt-out, we in the county will be left with even higher property taxes. If I have access to surface water, can I not pay taxes like the cities?
TCEQ has now ADMITTED that it does NOT any statutory authority to create or initiate creation of a water district in a PGMA that pre-dates Senate Bill 2 (2001). TCEQ is merely using one of its' own adopted rules. However, the statutory law that allows the TCEQ to use their own rule when there is no specific law in place also states that there must be a citation to the statutory law in the Commission adopted rule... otherwise the commission adopted rule is void. There is NO citation... in a nutshell... TCEQ has no legal basis in statutory law or Commission adopted rule... hence the ALJ should dismiss this case. Let see what kind of a judge we have here. Crooked is as crooked does.
Convince me that I need to be taxed and regulated by another entity. When cities, like Lakeway, opt-out, we in the county will be left with even higher property taxes. If I have access to surface water, can I not pay taxes like the cities?