You have to watch both movies but No Strings Attached was clearly better. While I enjoyed both movies, No Strings Attached had a more realistic plot and was at least two times better. Friends with Benefits had it's moments but was made for a younger audience (stereotypical 15-19 year olds). Talking fast to each other and throwing in witty remarks could be mistaken for humor but it didn't fool me.
ZsToRm - 11 years ago
You have to watch both movies but No Strings Attached was clearly better. While I enjoyed both movies, No Strings Attached had a more realistic plot and was at least two times better. Friends with Benefits had it's moments but was made for a younger audience (stereotypical 15-19 year olds). Talking fast to each other and throwing in witty remarks could be mistaken for humor but it didn't fool me.
ZsToRm - 11 years ago
You have to watch both movies but No Strings Attached was clearly better. While I enjoyed both movies, No Strings Attached had a more realistic plot and was at least two times better. Friends with Benefits had it's moments but was made for a younger audience (stereotypical 15-19 year olds). Talking fast to each other and throwing in witty remarks could be mistaken for humor but it didn't fool me.
ZsToRm - 11 years ago
You have to watch both movies but No Strings Attached was clearly better. While I enjoyed both movies, No Strings Attached had a more realistic plot and was at least two times better. Friends with Benefits had it's moments but was made for a younger audience (stereotypical 15-19 year olds). Talking fast to each other and throwing in witty remarks could be mistaken for humor but it didn't fool me.
You have to watch both movies but No Strings Attached was clearly better. While I enjoyed both movies, No Strings Attached had a more realistic plot and was at least two times better. Friends with Benefits had it's moments but was made for a younger audience (stereotypical 15-19 year olds). Talking fast to each other and throwing in witty remarks could be mistaken for humor but it didn't fool me.
You have to watch both movies but No Strings Attached was clearly better. While I enjoyed both movies, No Strings Attached had a more realistic plot and was at least two times better. Friends with Benefits had it's moments but was made for a younger audience (stereotypical 15-19 year olds). Talking fast to each other and throwing in witty remarks could be mistaken for humor but it didn't fool me.
You have to watch both movies but No Strings Attached was clearly better. While I enjoyed both movies, No Strings Attached had a more realistic plot and was at least two times better. Friends with Benefits had it's moments but was made for a younger audience (stereotypical 15-19 year olds). Talking fast to each other and throwing in witty remarks could be mistaken for humor but it didn't fool me.
You have to watch both movies but No Strings Attached was clearly better. While I enjoyed both movies, No Strings Attached had a more realistic plot and was at least two times better. Friends with Benefits had it's moments but was made for a younger audience (stereotypical 15-19 year olds). Talking fast to each other and throwing in witty remarks could be mistaken for humor but it didn't fool me.