There are many times that I will go to watch the live or pre-recorded shows on the JB site and i cannot get it to play. I want Flash to die, but for now, who is going to suffer from an embedded YouTube video? I could imagine that switching to YouTube would cut down on your bandwidth costs.
corneroffice - 12 years ago
Simple. Easy to use. Complete.
A couple of hangs a few times, but page reload gets it going again.....?
I prefer HTML 5, in fact I removed Flash (and Java) from most of my systems. My media-center-box still runs Flash but with a Flash-blocking browser plug-in.
That said, I tend to watch shows I don't download on YouTube (the plug-in will force HTML 5 or plain H.264) just to save you guys some bandwidth!
Html 5 is much better option than flash since flash is garbage. However, I download 90% of what I watch from JB. I download so I can watch on my laptop or my Android phone...plus I use it as a commuter so streaming doesn't always work.
Travis - 12 years ago
I usually watch from my mobile device. Using the youtube app seems to get the best playback.
BjornP - 12 years ago
Allows me to watch the shows on my non-arm-based tablet. Perfect.
DoctorKraz - 12 years ago
I am liking the html5 on your webpage better than the youtube pages. However, lately i've been using the torrents to download the episodes and watch them that way.
Chris - 12 years ago
I use you tube anyway as the player buffers better
Chris - 12 years ago
I use you tube anyway as the player buffers better
Pleeeease bring back the html5 player!
As you pointed out in one of the shows, flash clearly needs to die!
The experience is so much nicer on my arch linux notebook with html5 than with flash.
Kevin Cox - 12 years ago
Embedded Youtube can use html5 btw. Although I think it doesn't if you have ads enabled.
There are many times that I will go to watch the live or pre-recorded shows on the JB site and i cannot get it to play. I want Flash to die, but for now, who is going to suffer from an embedded YouTube video? I could imagine that switching to YouTube would cut down on your bandwidth costs.
Simple. Easy to use. Complete.
A couple of hangs a few times, but page reload gets it going again.....?
Love ALL your JB antics. Crazy Fun!
I prefer HTML 5, in fact I removed Flash (and Java) from most of my systems. My media-center-box still runs Flash but with a Flash-blocking browser plug-in.
That said, I tend to watch shows I don't download on YouTube (the plug-in will force HTML 5 or plain H.264) just to save you guys some bandwidth!
Html 5 is much better option than flash since flash is garbage. However, I download 90% of what I watch from JB. I download so I can watch on my laptop or my Android phone...plus I use it as a commuter so streaming doesn't always work.
I usually watch from my mobile device. Using the youtube app seems to get the best playback.
Allows me to watch the shows on my non-arm-based tablet. Perfect.
I am liking the html5 on your webpage better than the youtube pages. However, lately i've been using the torrents to download the episodes and watch them that way.
I use you tube anyway as the player buffers better
I use you tube anyway as the player buffers better
Pleeeease bring back the html5 player!
As you pointed out in one of the shows, flash clearly needs to die!
The experience is so much nicer on my arch linux notebook with html5 than with flash.
Embedded Youtube can use html5 btw. Although I think it doesn't if you have ads enabled.