See this poll on: https://poll.fm/7399020/embed
Give others the chance to vote.
Share this poll, because the more votes the better.
Create your own.
Opinions! We all have them. Find out what people really think with polls and surveys from Crowdsignal.
closed
oops sorry
Also, probably should have gone with the general discussion, where none of 8 GPs didn't have any doubts.
Saving my patient who can't even afford $5.90? More like 'Aren't I a good chap!'
For a trial -- WITHOUT a CMI [Consumer Medicines Information] is against all Quality Use of Medicines. Would YOU accept an unknown substance blind and on trust prescribed by a colleague?
Xanax: what's all the worry about? Then why do some of your colleagues refuse to touch it?
Saving my patient who can't even afford $5.90? More like 'Aren't I a good chap!'
For a trial -- WITHOUT a CMI [Consumer Medicines Information] is against all Quality Use of Medicines. Would YOU accept an unknown substance blind and on trust prescribed by a colleague?
Xanax: what's all the worry about? Then why do some of your colleagues refuse to touch it?
Sample packs are of great benefit in many situations, including the following:
For disadvanted patients who can not afford either PBS subsidised or Private Script medications.
For a trial of therapy such as antidepressants / PPI`s etc.
The RACP has no concept of what the practice of medicine is like @ the coal face ie General Practice - this is the same body that recommended that Xanax be restricted to be presribed only by members of the RACP - how were they ever going to provide a good service to patients when you wait 2 months for a specialist appointment.