"Which do you feel is better for games of 40K?"

1 Comment

  • John Ru - 8 years ago

    First off, I'll say that I like the formation rules. They give some neat ways to use your toys, and unlike unbound add some secret sauce needed to make some less used units better, but (BIG BUT) it can also make good units even better and even over overpoweringly so, with no apparent downside.

    That being said, I think it gives some very fluffy and interesting ways to play with your toy soldiers, such as the Space Marine Battle Company, or the Eldar Warhost, as an example of Decurion style play, These fit very well with the fluff of how these armies should play. But when these formation go against CAD style play, it can be VERY unbalance, and until Gee-Dubs gets around to giving the Formation treatment to all the armies, people without will feel the pinch. Not to mention some things can be very hit and miss, as with any written product from GW.

    From a Business side, it's also good for the Game as it really encourages people to go out and buy multiple kits of things they would normally never buy more than one to a few of, and this is good because if people want this Game to survive, they have to inject it with Cash, and you do that by selling kits.
    This thing doesn't survive on dreams and rainbows...

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment