Mons Scicluna has the right to express his views on the political scene. But, why is it that Mons Scicluna does not say that he is addressing both LP and PN? I am no fan of either PN or PN. The PN says the wording was not addressed to it. Mons Scicluna stays dumb. So one can deduce that the LP is the culprit. The LP does not worry about what the archbishop says. Is the Maltese Church really declaring itself biased and so, what it says is irrelevant?
peppi x - 8 years ago
Yes: Scicluna is right to speak up on matters of the State but what should have been asked is about the way Scicluna seems to be choosy when he speaks and speaks in a way that he make it is easy for one political party to interpret his works as being critical of the other party. - Peppi x
joseph mifsud - 8 years ago
If the archbishop has a right to speak, so have the people have a right to criticise the bishop,and as things are going he is trying to take us back to the sixties,he thinks,and the pols show church attendance going downhill.ALL HIS FAULT.
Mons Scicluna has the right to express his views on the political scene. But, why is it that Mons Scicluna does not say that he is addressing both LP and PN? I am no fan of either PN or PN. The PN says the wording was not addressed to it. Mons Scicluna stays dumb. So one can deduce that the LP is the culprit. The LP does not worry about what the archbishop says. Is the Maltese Church really declaring itself biased and so, what it says is irrelevant?
Yes: Scicluna is right to speak up on matters of the State but what should have been asked is about the way Scicluna seems to be choosy when he speaks and speaks in a way that he make it is easy for one political party to interpret his works as being critical of the other party. - Peppi x
If the archbishop has a right to speak, so have the people have a right to criticise the bishop,and as things are going he is trying to take us back to the sixties,he thinks,and the pols show church attendance going downhill.ALL HIS FAULT.