Which choice best describes how you'd feel about an hours of service rule that restricts/expands available hours based in part on fatigue monitoring tech? (poll 9835520)

Which choice best describes how you'd feel about an hours of service rule that restricts/expands available hours based in part on fatigue monitoring tech?

I’m in favor of exploration, but only if the tech is proven and applicable to all drivers in a consistent way.

I’m in favor of exploration if it’s guaranteed not to reduce my income.

I’m in favor of exploration because the current rule doesn’t keep fatigued drivers off the road.

Any fatigue monitoring is too much of a privacy intrusion for my comfort.

If it involves driver-facing cams, it would be too much of a privacy intrusion.

There are too many legal barriers for govt. to reach so far into drivers’ health.

I’m not sure, too many unknowns

Vote View Results

See this poll on: https://poll.fm/9835520/embed

Nicholas Williams - 7 years ago

Maybe not driver facing cameras, but there does need to be something done about the current HOS regs, particularly the 14 hour rule. If a driver needs to pull off for a nap, they should be able to stop the 14 hour clock so as not to be penalized for not working 14 hours straight.
John holt - 7 years ago

I told my boss if they ever put a driver facing camera on me the next he would hear from is my lawyer for invasion of privacy law,there has been several lawsuits already won in the court system on this issue already but most drivers don't know that!
John holt - 7 years ago

I told my boss if they ever put a driver facing camera on me the next he would hear from is my lawyer for invasion of privacy law,there has been several lawsuits already won in the court system on this issue already but most drivers don't know that!