If they trade out for for 12 and 22 and a one next year. You pass on Barkley and Chubb or a an coroners say Mike McClinchey and with 22 you you can add guice or Stud LB and let's face it bills will have a tough schedule so their first rounder might be a top 10
Dave - 6 years ago
Agree with Mickey football..... No way the giants will move from 2 to 12 and look to get equal value...they will ask for much more. If your going to pass on future pro bowlers like Barkley and Q. Nelson..... Then you better get a ton of high picks for years to come.
Nicholas Mancini - 6 years ago
There's no trade without bills 2019 first round pick besides 12,22 ,56and 65.
Nicholas Mancini - 6 years ago
There's no trade without bills 2019 first round pick besides 12,22 ,56and 65.
Adam - 6 years ago
The chart needs to be adjusted when you are looking at franchise QB's in the top slots. Many of the top players are gone by #12. If they want a RB he will be in there in round 2 and 3. Better value for Giants is with Jets and their 6th pick and two seconds and maybe a 4th. This way they can take Nelson or Chubb and get lineman in round 2. McGlinchey is a 1st round pick in this draft only. Personally I would take either Allen or Darnold at 2. We need to think about the future. Look at lousy organizations like the Jets that haven't had a great QB since the early 70's. This may not be the thinking of 66yr old GM with a 38 yr old QB on decline. But it should be
Mikey Football - 6 years ago
C'mon Walt, u are better than this. NO WAY do Giants go under chart value to move from #2 out of the top 10 without a future first rounder. Look at what the Skins paid in 2012 to move up to #2 (#6, #39, 2013 first, and 2014 first). Or what Philly paid for Browns #2 in 2016 and their 2017 fourth (#8, #77, #100, 2017 first and 2018 second). Giants more likely to trade to 4,5, or 6. If they going all the way down to 12, I guarantee it will either be OVER chart value and/or include a future first round pick.
Joseph - 6 years ago
I don't think the Bills would trade into number 2, I see the top 4 prospects as somewhat similar, they all have ups and downs. Trading anywhere in the top 5 should guarantee you a solid QB1 and you don't have to give up as many picks.
Ty - 6 years ago
I am a diehard Bills fan and i rather them deal less and get 4 or 5th pick. I would be happy with Rosen personally. Seems like way to many picks to move up 11 spots.
Dennis Weber - 6 years ago
As a long-time Bills fan I am all for this trade. Buffalo hasn't had a good QB since Jim Kelly. I believe that Cleveland will pick Darnold and that would give the Bills Josh Rosen. The Browns would love this Bills-Giants trade also. Assuming Indy would take Chubb at #3, Cleveland would end up with their top choice at QB and Barkley at #4. The Giants get a boatload of high picks and EVERYONE is happy. Let's git r done.
Riley - 6 years ago
I'm a Giants fan. Nope to that. The Bills screwed up their chance with the Giants by trading Corey Glenn. The LT, paired with their original two firsts and a second would have done it. Nope to this. Would rather have the LT and picks than the Bengals pick and Bills picks you proposed. It's not enough.
If the Bills wanted the 2nd pick, they screwed themselves with their trade today.
If they trade out for for 12 and 22 and a one next year. You pass on Barkley and Chubb or a an coroners say Mike McClinchey and with 22 you you can add guice or Stud LB and let's face it bills will have a tough schedule so their first rounder might be a top 10
Agree with Mickey football..... No way the giants will move from 2 to 12 and look to get equal value...they will ask for much more. If your going to pass on future pro bowlers like Barkley and Q. Nelson..... Then you better get a ton of high picks for years to come.
There's no trade without bills 2019 first round pick besides 12,22 ,56and 65.
There's no trade without bills 2019 first round pick besides 12,22 ,56and 65.
The chart needs to be adjusted when you are looking at franchise QB's in the top slots. Many of the top players are gone by #12. If they want a RB he will be in there in round 2 and 3. Better value for Giants is with Jets and their 6th pick and two seconds and maybe a 4th. This way they can take Nelson or Chubb and get lineman in round 2. McGlinchey is a 1st round pick in this draft only. Personally I would take either Allen or Darnold at 2. We need to think about the future. Look at lousy organizations like the Jets that haven't had a great QB since the early 70's. This may not be the thinking of 66yr old GM with a 38 yr old QB on decline. But it should be
C'mon Walt, u are better than this. NO WAY do Giants go under chart value to move from #2 out of the top 10 without a future first rounder. Look at what the Skins paid in 2012 to move up to #2 (#6, #39, 2013 first, and 2014 first). Or what Philly paid for Browns #2 in 2016 and their 2017 fourth (#8, #77, #100, 2017 first and 2018 second). Giants more likely to trade to 4,5, or 6. If they going all the way down to 12, I guarantee it will either be OVER chart value and/or include a future first round pick.
I don't think the Bills would trade into number 2, I see the top 4 prospects as somewhat similar, they all have ups and downs. Trading anywhere in the top 5 should guarantee you a solid QB1 and you don't have to give up as many picks.
I am a diehard Bills fan and i rather them deal less and get 4 or 5th pick. I would be happy with Rosen personally. Seems like way to many picks to move up 11 spots.
As a long-time Bills fan I am all for this trade. Buffalo hasn't had a good QB since Jim Kelly. I believe that Cleveland will pick Darnold and that would give the Bills Josh Rosen. The Browns would love this Bills-Giants trade also. Assuming Indy would take Chubb at #3, Cleveland would end up with their top choice at QB and Barkley at #4. The Giants get a boatload of high picks and EVERYONE is happy. Let's git r done.
I'm a Giants fan. Nope to that. The Bills screwed up their chance with the Giants by trading Corey Glenn. The LT, paired with their original two firsts and a second would have done it. Nope to this. Would rather have the LT and picks than the Bengals pick and Bills picks you proposed. It's not enough.
If the Bills wanted the 2nd pick, they screwed themselves with their trade today.